Skip to main content

Security report for kotviacatechnika.sk

Jakub Kokeš · Manufacturing · Slovakia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jakub Kokeš operates a specialized anchoring technology business primarily serving construction and industrial sectors in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. The company offers a wide range of fastening products such as screws, anchors, rivets, and related accessories, complemented by professional consulting and logistical services including free delivery and material returns. The website reflects a regional market position with multiple branch offices and localized contact points, targeting professional contractors and businesses in the construction industry. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, and Google Analytics, with a custom or proprietary CMS platform. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and product categorization. SEO and accessibility are adequately addressed, though some advanced security headers are missing. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and anonymizes user IPs in analytics, demonstrating a baseline security posture. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements, providing users control over tracking preferences. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in security maturity. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, with a moderate risk profile. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and technical hardening would further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kotviacatechnika.sk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as a niche supplier in the anchoring and fastening market, leveraging regional presence in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Its competitive advantages include free delivery, free pull-out testing, and expert consulting services, which enhance customer trust and retention. The business model combines product sales with value-added services, targeting B2B customers such as contractors and industrial clients. The presence of multiple branches indicates a stable operational footprint. Partnerships with related companies like www.kotevnitechnika.cz and www.vilpe.cz suggest a collaborative ecosystem. Growth potential lies in expanding service offerings and enhancing digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a foundational security posture with HTTPS enforcement and GDPR-compliant cookie consent. Use of Google Analytics with IP anonymization and retargeting services is transparent and user-consented. However, the lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure channels limits the site's security maturity. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Security headers beyond HTTPS are not explicitly present, which could be improved. Overall, the site is secure for typical business operations but would benefit from formalized security governance and incident management disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain and document data retention policies and privacy practices to strengthen GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Jakub Kokeš CZ, s.r.o.
VAT number
SK2022148293
Registration number
36286575
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jakub Kokeš
Description
Supplier and specialist in anchoring technology products including screws, anchors, rivets, and accessories for construction and industrial use.
Key services
Product sales, Professional consulting, Free delivery in CZ and SK, Free pull-out testing, Anchoring plans, Material returns, Fast delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Sklik retargeting, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anonymize IP in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adwords, Sklik
Tracking pixels
Sklik retargeting
Marketing tools
Sklik
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and product catalog
  2. Complies with GDPR cookie consent requirements
  3. Multiple physical branch locations with detailed contact info
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information
  5. Uses modern tracking and advertising tools with consent mechanisms
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with asynchronous loading of Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts, improving performance and user experience. CSS and HTML5 standards are followed, with responsive design for mobile devices. The site lacks explicit CMS identification, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and script optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and semantic markup. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph properties, and hreflang for multilingual support. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports business needs but has opportunities for modernization and optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kotviacatechnika.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kotviacatechnika.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.