Skip to main content

Security report for kosmetik-treff.de

Aesthetika Seevetal Kosmetikinstitut · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aesthetika Seevetal Kosmetikinstitut is a small local beauty and cosmetic service provider based in Seevetal, Germany. The business offers a range of cosmetic treatments including facial care, foot care, make-up, depilation, permanent make-up, and nail care, targeting a broad audience interested in personal care and beauty. The website serves as an informational portal with basic navigation and contact details, reflecting a modest digital presence appropriate for a small service business. Technically, the website is built using basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, with the phpWebEd CMS platform. It includes legacy technology such as SWFObject for Flash content, which is outdated and poses security and compatibility risks. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking, but no cookie consent mechanism or privacy policies are present, indicating gaps in privacy compliance. The site shows moderate performance and basic accessibility but lacks mobile optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS as implied by the Google Analytics script source, but no security headers were detected in the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, combined with outdated Flash usage and lack of security headers, lowers the overall security posture. Contact information is clearly provided, but no incident response or security policy information is available. Overall, the website is functional and provides essential business information but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and modernization of technical components to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kosmetik-treff.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kosmetik-treff.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kosmetik-treff.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the local beauty and cosmetic sector, focusing on personal care services and products. Its market positioning is that of a small, community-focused institute offering personalized treatments. The business model is service-oriented with direct customer engagement through appointments and consultations. Revenue streams likely include treatment fees and product sales, with partnerships such as the use of Dr. Baumann products enhancing credibility. The website's limited digital sophistication suggests a traditional business with modest online marketing efforts. Growth potential may be constrained by the lack of advanced digital tools and compliance features. The partnership ecosystem appears minimal, with no evident subsidiaries or parent companies. Strategic observations highlight the need for digital modernization and compliance upgrades to remain competitive and trustworthy.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic with several notable gaps. The use of HTTPS is a positive indicator, but the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The presence of outdated Flash technology introduces potential vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR requirements. Incident response readiness is not demonstrated, with no dedicated security contact information. Data protection practices appear minimal, and tracking via Google Analytics occurs without visible user consent mechanisms. Overall, the security culture appears informal and reactive rather than proactive, exposing the business to regulatory and operational risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR.
  2. Remove or replace Flash-based components to eliminate security and compatibility risks.
  3. Configure and deploy essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options).
  4. Establish an incident response contact channel and publish a security policy page.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aesthetika Seevetal Kosmetikinstitut
Description
Pflegen Sie sich schön, wir helfen Ihnen dabei. Wohlfühlatmosphäre, Entspannung und professionelle Beratung im Bereich Kosmetik und Pflege.
Key services
Kosmetikbehandlungen (facial treatments), Fußpflege (foot care), Make-Up, Depilation, Permanent Make-Up, Hand- und Nagelpflege, Beratung
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Google Analytics, SWFObject (Flash embedding library)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by Google Analytics script loaded over https
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small local cosmetic institute in Germany with basic online presence.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap under GDPR.
  3. Use of outdated Flash technology is a security and compatibility concern.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. No security headers detected; SSL configuration unknown but HTTPS implied.
  7. CMS used is phpWebEd v.2.1, which may be outdated and require security review.
Technical notes

Notes

The website relies on legacy technologies including SWFObject for Flash embedding and an older CMS (phpWebEd v.2.1), which may pose security and maintenance challenges. The tech stack is basic, with no modern frameworks or platforms detected. Performance is moderate but could be improved with updated technologies and optimization. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility is limited, and mobile responsiveness is poor, potentially impacting user engagement. Hosting provider details are not available, limiting infrastructure assessment. Modernization opportunities include migrating to a contemporary CMS, removing deprecated technologies, and implementing responsive design.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kosmetik-treff.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kosmetik-treff.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.