Skip to main content

Security report for korte.lv

KORTE.LV SIA · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KORTE.LV SIA is a Latvian small manufacturing and retail company specializing in artificial stone products for kitchens, bathrooms, commercial spaces, offices, horeca, medical, and ship interiors. The company offers a broad range of products including kitchen surfaces, sinks, shower trays, and design items made from materials such as Corian®, Meganite®, and STARON®. The website is multilingual, targeting Latvian, English, and Russian-speaking customers, and presents clear contact information and product categories. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Impreza theme and several plugins including Contact Form 7 and Ultimate VC Addons. It integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security and uses Hotjar and HubSpot for analytics and marketing. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacks standard security headers and a cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the site is professional and functional with room for security and privacy improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching korte.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on artificial stone products, serving both residential and commercial markets. Its business model is product manufacturing and direct retail, with a clear emphasis on quality and customization. The website's structured data and contact details support legitimacy and trust. The presence of multilingual content indicates an intent to serve a broader regional audience. Marketing tools like HubSpot and Hotjar suggest active customer engagement and data-driven marketing. The company appears established since 2001, positioning itself as a niche player in Latvia. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The business benefits from consistent branding and a clear product portfolio, but lacks visible certifications or formal security policies on the website.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from spam. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism is present. The use of third-party marketing and analytics scripts introduces moderate tracking but no explicit cookie consent is provided, which may raise GDPR compliance concerns. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, a cookie consent mechanism, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard HTTP security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, HSTS, and Referrer-Policy to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to demonstrate commitment to security and provide clear incident response channels.
  4. Review and audit third-party scripts for privacy compliance and minimize unnecessary tracking.
  5. Attempt to retrieve and publish WHOIS domain registration details to improve trust and transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
KORTE.LV SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KORTE.LV SIA
Description
Izgatavojam mākslīgā akmens izstrādājumus, virsmas virtuvei vannasistabai, bāra letes, virtuves izlietnes, galdus Corian® Meganite® STARON® LOTTE LG HI-MACS®
Key services
Artificial stone kitchen surfaces, Bathroom surfaces and sinks, Commercial and horeca industry products, Office furniture and reception desks, Custom shower trays and design products, Medical and laboratory sinks
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Contact Form 7, Ultimate VC Addons, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Hotjar, HubSpot, Rank Math SEO
Frameworks
Impreza WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Hotjar and HubSpot scripts for analytics and marketing

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar, HubSpot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about artificial stone products
  2. Multilingual support with Latvian, English, and Russian versions
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in header and footer
  4. No visible cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy
  5. No visible terms of service or security policy pages
  6. Use of modern WordPress theme and plugins
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  8. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source
  9. Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection on forms
  10. Presence of marketing and analytics tools (Hotjar, HubSpot)
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Impreza theme and several well-known plugins. It uses jQuery and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. Marketing and analytics tools include Hotjar and HubSpot, indicating a focus on user behavior analysis and customer relationship management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and deferred CSS. However, the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance. The WHOIS query limit prevented domain registration verification, representing a risk in domain trust assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with korte.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review korte.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.