Skip to main content

Security report for korobuve.lv

SIA KORO BŪVE · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA KORO BŪVE is a Latvian construction company specializing in a range of construction services including project management, reinforced concrete structures, concrete floors, and energy construction. The company targets clients in Latvia, including both private individuals and legal entities, positioning itself as a specialized service provider in the construction sector. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a clear focus on its core services and partnerships. Technically, the website employs common analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies, which could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive GDPR-aligned privacy policy in Latvian, though no cookie consent mechanism was detected. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could benefit from enhanced security practices and more transparent contact and incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching korobuve.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the specialized construction sector in Latvia, offering services that include project management and various concrete construction works. Its business model is service-oriented, catering to both private and corporate clients. The presence of multiple partner logos suggests an established partnership ecosystem. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized company with a focused market presence. The lack of WHOIS data limits external verification of domain legitimacy, but the website content aligns with the claimed business. The company appears to maintain a moderate level of digital marketing and analytics integration, supporting growth and client engagement efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is used, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy considerations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended security headers, publishing security policies, and providing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure essential security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a clear cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply fully with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information including contact channels for reporting security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with data protection standards.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
SIA KORO BŪVE
Registration number
44103022322
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA KORO BŪVE
Description
SIA KORO BŪVE is a construction company specializing in construction project management, monolithic and precast reinforced concrete structures, concrete floors, roads and squares, floor coverings and stair coverings, and energy construction services.
Key services
Būvprojektu vadība, Monolītās un saliekamās dzelzsbetona konstrukcijas, Betona grīdas, ceļi un laukumi, Grīdas segumi un kāpņu pārklājumi, Energobūvniecība
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Comprehensive privacy policy in Latvian language compliant with GDPR.
  3. No explicit cookie policy or consent mechanism found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML content.
  5. No security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and advertising scripts.
  7. No visible forms or data collection fields on homepage content.
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) detected in HTML head.
  9. Website uses HTTPS as indicated by URL but no security headers detected in provided data.
  10. Business information consistent with a small Latvian construction company.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with integration of Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. It loads jQuery from a CDN and uses asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. The site is mobile optimized and has a consistent design with clear navigation. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is detectable from the HTML content. Performance is moderate with potential for improvement by optimizing images and scripts further. The lack of structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) limits SEO potential. Accessibility is basic and could be enhanced with ARIA attributes and semantic HTML improvements. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but has room for modernization and SEO enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with korobuve.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review korobuve.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.