Skip to main content

Security report for kormany.hu

Magyarország Kormánya · Government · Hungary

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website kormany.hu is the official government portal of Hungary, providing authoritative information and services related to the Hungarian government. It serves Hungarian citizens and other stakeholders interested in government affairs. The site is enterprise-level, reflecting its role as a national government resource, and was established in 2001, consistent with the domain registration date. The website uses modern web technologies, notably the Angular framework, and is designed with good mobile optimization and user experience in mind. However, explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies are not found in the provided content, which is a gap in compliance and user transparency. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled, but lacks visible security headers and incident response contact information. Overall, the domain registration and website content are consistent and trustworthy, reflecting a legitimate government entity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kormany.hu

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

As an official government website, kormany.hu holds a strong market position as the primary digital interface for Hungarian government communications. Its business model is public service and information dissemination without commercial intent. The target audience includes Hungarian residents and those interested in government policies and services. The site does not appear to engage in advertising or affiliate marketing, focusing solely on governmental content. The lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies suggests an area for improvement in regulatory compliance. The site’s technology stack and design indicate a commitment to modern web standards, supporting accessibility and mobile users. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified, consistent with a centralized government portal.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of a security policy or incident response contact channels limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which are recommended best practices for government websites. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including abuse@ or security@ email addresses.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Magyarország Kormánya
Description
Official government website of Hungary providing information and services related to the Hungarian government.
Key services
Government news and announcements, Public service information, Access to government resources
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular (implied by _ngcontent attributes), CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official Hungarian government portal
  2. Content is in Hungarian language with some English metadata
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies explicitly found in the provided HTML
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
  5. No social media links detected in the provided content
  6. Site uses Angular framework for frontend
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  9. SSL is enabled and appears properly configured
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular framework, indicating a modern single-page application architecture. The CSS and HTML are structured for responsive design, supporting mobile and desktop users effectively. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization detected. The site lacks visible analytics or tracking scripts, suggesting minimal user tracking. No CMS or hosting provider information was identified from the provided content. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and privacy compliance documents indicates areas for modernization and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kormany.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kormany.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.