Skip to main content

Security report for koongo.gr

Koongo · E-commerce · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Email security.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Koongo is a medium-sized e-commerce SaaS provider specializing in product feed management and marketplace integration, enabling online sellers to automate synchronization of product data and orders across multiple sales channels. The company is positioned as a trusted provider with a comprehensive service offering, including integrations with major marketplaces like Amazon and eBay, and supports over 500 sales channels. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern analytics and marketing tools, but lacks a valid SSL certificate, which impacts security posture significantly. Security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are properly implemented, reflecting good privacy compliance. However, the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a critical vulnerability that must be addressed to improve trust and security. Overall, the site is content-rich, professionally designed, and provides clear business and contact information, supporting a positive user experience and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching koongo.gr

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
60
Email security
45
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Koongo operates in the e-commerce sector, targeting online retailers who need to manage product feeds and marketplace listings efficiently. Its business model is SaaS-based, offering subscription plans with a free 30-day trial. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with major e-commerce platforms and marketplaces, enhancing its market reach. The parent company is NoStress Commerce s.r.o., based in Prague, Czech Republic. Koongo maintains a strong digital presence with multilingual support and active social media channels. Customer testimonials and third-party review badges reinforce its market credibility. The platform's flexibility with custom feed layouts and API integrations positions it well for diverse customer needs. Growth indicators include active blog content, webinars, and marketing campaigns focused on expanding marketplace reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates moderate security maturity with the presence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS severely undermine the security posture, exposing users to risks such as data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No DNSSEC or CAA records are configured, which could improve domain security. The site uses several third-party scripts and analytics tools, which are common but require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly found, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. Overall, while some best practices are observed, critical improvements are needed to meet modern security standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable outdated protocols.
  3. Implement DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance domain security and certificate issuance control.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  6. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  7. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, utilizing jQuery, Modernizr, and various optimization and analytics plugins such as Autoptimize, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Plausible Analytics. The site is multilingual with hreflang tags supporting several European languages. Hosting is on a server with IP 88.86.125.5 and DNS managed by instradns.com. Performance data is missing, indicating potential gaps in monitoring or reporting. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements present. SEO is supported by structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph tags, enhancing search engine visibility. However, the absence of HTTPS and valid SSL certificate is a significant technical risk. The site uses multiple external domains for analytics, marketing, and customer support, which require careful management to avoid privacy and security issues.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with koongo.gr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review koongo.gr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.