Skip to main content

Security report for koongo.es

Koongo · E-commerce · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Koongo is a SaaS platform specializing in product feed management and multi-channel marketplace integration for online sellers. The company offers extensive integrations with over 500 sales channels including Amazon, eBay, and Google Shopping, enabling sellers to synchronize inventory, automate order processing, and optimize product data. Positioned as a reliable and scalable solution, Koongo targets e-commerce businesses seeking to expand their online presence efficiently. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support, primarily in Spanish, and includes trust signals such as customer testimonials and third-party review badges. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS implementation is a critical security shortfall that undermines user trust and data protection. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive cookie consent mechanisms and a detailed privacy policy. Overall, Koongo demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation but requires urgent improvements in security infrastructure to meet industry standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching koongo.es

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
60
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Koongo operates in the competitive e-commerce SaaS market, providing essential tools for sellers to manage product feeds and marketplace listings. Its competitive advantage lies in broad channel support, ease of integration, and automation capabilities. The business model is subscription-based with free trials to attract users. The company leverages partnerships and affiliate programs to expand reach. Target customers include small to medium-sized online retailers and brands aiming for multi-channel sales. Growth indicators include active customer testimonials and continuous platform updates. The parent company, NoStress Commerce s.r.o., is based in Prague, Czech Republic. Koongo maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and relevant content, supporting its credibility and market positioning.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security posture with implementation of security headers such as Content Security Policy and X-Frame-Options, which help mitigate common web attacks. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent a critical vulnerability, exposing users to data interception and undermining secure communications. No evidence of incident response policies or security certifications was found. The site uses secure cookie consent mechanisms and limits unsafe script sources, but the use of 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' in CSP reduces effectiveness. Overall, the security maturity is limited by fundamental HTTPS misconfiguration, which should be prioritized to protect user data and maintain compliance with GDPR and industry best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Install and properly configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated versions.
  3. Enhance Content Security Policy by removing 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' where feasible.
  4. Implement HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce HTTPS.
  5. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  6. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize vulnerabilities and ensure compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NoStress Commerce s.r.o.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.8.1, utilizing Nginx as the web server. It employs modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Modernizr, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics, Smartlook, and Intercom chat. The site supports multiple languages and is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design. However, performance metrics are missing, indicating potential gaps in performance monitoring. The lack of HTTPS and TLS support is a significant technical risk. Hosting appears to be managed via Instradns nameservers with IP 88.86.125.5. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and organization information, enhancing search engine visibility. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires urgent security upgrades and performance monitoring enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with koongo.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review koongo.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.