Skip to main content

Security report for koongo.dk

Koongo · E-commerce · Denmark

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Email security.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Koongo is a Danish-based SaaS company specializing in product feed management and multi-channel marketplace integration for online sellers. The platform supports over 500 sales channels including Amazon, eBay, and Google Shopping, enabling sellers to synchronize product data and orders automatically. Koongo positions itself as a cost-effective and user-friendly solution with extensive e-commerce platform integrations and a strong customer support reputation. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and includes comprehensive business and contact information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools, but suffers from a critical lack of valid SSL/TLS configuration, exposing it to security risks. Security headers are partially implemented, and privacy compliance is well addressed with cookie consent mechanisms and a detailed privacy policy. Overall, Koongo demonstrates a mature digital presence but must urgently address SSL issues to improve security posture and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching koongo.dk

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
60
Email security
45
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Koongo operates in the e-commerce sector, targeting online retailers who want to expand sales across multiple marketplaces efficiently. Its competitive advantage lies in automation of product feed management and order synchronization, reducing manual workload and errors. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with a free 30-day trial and tiered pricing. Koongo's partnerships with major e-commerce platforms and marketplaces enhance its ecosystem and market reach. Customer testimonials and third-party review badges indicate strong user satisfaction and market credibility. The parent company, NoStress Commerce s.r.o., is based in Prague, Czech Republic, suggesting a regional European focus with potential for broader expansion. The company leverages affiliate marketing and maintains active social media channels to support growth.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weakened by the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of TLS protocol support, which are critical for protecting user data and ensuring secure communications. While security headers like Content Security Policy and X-Frame-Options are present, the incomplete HSTS implementation and missing OCSP stapling reduce overall effectiveness. No known vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, and no sensitive data exposure is evident in the HTML content. The site uses secure forms and cookie consent mechanisms, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the invalid SSL undermines user trust and exposes the site to potential interception or man-in-the-middle attacks. Incident response and security policy documentation are not found, indicating room for improvement in security governance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure all site traffic.
  2. Enable and configure TLS 1.2 or higher protocols and strong cipher suites to enhance encryption strength.
  3. Expand HSTS policy to include subdomains and preload to enforce strict transport security.
  4. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  5. Publish clear security policies and incident response procedures to improve transparency and trust.
  6. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  7. Maintain and enhance cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms in line with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NoStress Commerce s.r.o.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Modernizr, Owl Carousel, and Fancybox. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics, Intercom, and Reditus Affiliate system. The site supports multiple languages and uses CDN and caching mechanisms (Cloudflare likely). Despite a rich feature set and good mobile optimization, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and TLS support, which is a significant technical risk. Performance metrics are not available, but the site uses optimized CSS and JS bundles. SEO is supported with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires urgent security upgrades to SSL/TLS configuration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with koongo.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review koongo.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.