Skip to main content

Security report for koongo.com

Koongo · E-commerce · Czech Republic

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Koongo is a specialized SaaS platform focused on enabling online sellers to succeed across multiple online marketplaces by automating product feed management and order synchronization. The company offers integrations with over 500 sales channels including major platforms like Amazon, eBay, and Google Shopping, targeting e-commerce businesses seeking to expand their sales reach efficiently. The website is professionally designed with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and good mobile optimization, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, and Intercom, but suffers from slow loading times and lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical security concern. Security posture is moderate with some best practices like SPF and DMARC in place, but the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols significantly reduces trust and security. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms implemented. Business credibility is supported by clear contact information, testimonials, and third-party review badges. Overall, Koongo presents a solid business offering with room for improvement in security infrastructure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching koongo.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
60
Email security
95
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention koongo.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
388
Employees
0
Customers
386
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
6%

9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for koongo.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Koongo occupies a niche in the e-commerce ecosystem by providing product feed management and marketplace integration services, enabling sellers to automate and optimize their multi-channel sales operations. Its competitive advantage lies in the breadth of supported platforms and marketplaces, ease of use, and advanced data filtering capabilities. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with free trials and tiered pricing. The company targets small to medium-sized e-commerce businesses and leverages partnerships with major e-commerce platforms and affiliate programs. Growth indicators include active customer testimonials and continuous addition of new sales channels. The parent company, NoStress Commerce s.r.o., anchors the business with a Czech Republic base. Strategic observations suggest focusing on improving security posture and performance to enhance customer trust and retention.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate but impaired by the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, exposing users to potential data interception and undermining trust. SPF and DMARC records are properly configured, reducing email spoofing risks. HSTS is enabled but limited by the absence of HTTPS. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, indicating a gap in transparency and preparedness. Cookie consent and privacy policies comply with GDPR, reflecting good data protection practices. The site uses secure third-party services for analytics and customer interaction but should prioritize fixing SSL issues and enhancing security headers. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly evident, suggesting areas for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and protect user data.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and strong cipher suites to improve encryption standards.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Implement additional security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  5. Optimize website performance to reduce load times and improve user experience, especially on mobile devices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NoStress Commerce s.r.o.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a variety of JavaScript libraries and third-party services including jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Intercom, and Bing Ads. The hosting provider is identified as Forpsi based on DNS nameservers. The site has a large page size and high resource count contributing to slow load times. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and language localization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. However, the invalid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent significant technical debt and security risk. The site uses cookie consent management and GDPR-compliant privacy mechanisms. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and strengthen security configurations to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with koongo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review koongo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.