Skip to main content

Security report for konteksts.lv

SIA KONTEKSTS · Other · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA KONTEKSTS is a Latvian-based professional translation company specializing in legal, technical, and notarized translations. The company targets businesses and individuals requiring precise and high-quality translation services, primarily in Latvia but also serving international clients via internet-enabled collaboration. The website reflects a small business with a focused service offering and a clear market niche in the translation sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and jQuery, featuring standard plugins and Google Analytics integration. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured, providing a good user experience and clear navigation. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, but the website content and business information appear consistent and legitimate. Overall, the site demonstrates a professional and trustworthy online presence suitable for its business domain.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching konteksts.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the translation services sector, focusing on legal and technical document translations with notarization options. Its business model is service-oriented, relying on skilled translators and editors. The market position is that of a specialized local provider with international reach through online collaboration. The website content emphasizes quality, professionalism, and client convenience. The presence of a cookie consent banner and privacy policy indicates compliance awareness. The company maintains a Facebook presence but lacks broader social media engagement. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found. The business appears small-sized with a stable niche focus and no visible certifications or awards. The website content quality and branding are consistent, supporting trustworthiness.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google Analytics with a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting basic privacy compliance. However, no advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The absence of contact emails on the site limits direct security communication channels. The WordPress CMS and plugins should be regularly updated to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a security policy or incident response page with contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to latest versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  4. Add explicit contact email addresses for general and security-related inquiries to facilitate communication.
  5. Consider adding a terms of service page to clarify user and client obligations and rights.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA KONTEKSTS
Description
Tulkošanas uzņēmums SIA „KONTEKSTS” atrodas Valmierā – lielākajā un ekonomiski aktīvākajā Vidzemes pilsētā. Juridisko tekstu un dokumentu tulkojumi un notariāli apliecināti tulkojumi.
Key services
Juridisko tekstu un dokumentu tulkojumi, Tehnisko tekstu tulkojumi, Vispārīga satura teksti, Korektūra un rediģēšana, Notariāli apliecināts tulkojums, Tulkojums ar tulkotāja apliecinājumu
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Analytics, Cookies.js, WordPress 5.5.15, qTranslate-XT
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional translation service based in Latvia
  2. Content is well structured and relevant to the business
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries
  5. Has cookie consent banner and privacy policy indicating GDPR awareness
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  7. No contact emails explicitly found in HTML source
  8. Phone number +371 26432590 clearly labeled as contact
  9. Social media presence on Facebook only
  10. No terms of service or security policy pages found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard WordPress CMS platform with Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for scripting. Google Fonts and Font Awesome provide styling and icons. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking and analytics. The site is mobile optimized and loads with moderate performance. The HTML is valid and SEO meta tags are present. Accessibility features are basic but present. No advanced hosting or CDN information is available from the HTML. The site does not expose sensitive data or use outdated libraries visibly. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with konteksts.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review konteksts.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.