Skip to main content

Security report for komunikaty.pl

Artegence SA · Government · Poland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Komunikaty.pl is a Polish online platform specializing in publishing official announcements such as tenders, bailiff auctions, and insolvency notices. It serves a niche market primarily composed of businesses, government entities, and legal professionals seeking up-to-date public notices. The website is professionally designed, with a clear structure and good mobile optimization, supporting a positive user experience. The platform monetizes through paid featured announcements and advertising partnerships. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for privacy compliance, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust from a registration standpoint, but the website's content and third-party integrations suggest legitimacy. Overall, Komunikaty.pl presents a reliable and compliant service for its target audience in Poland.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching komunikaty.pl

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a specialized position in the Polish market for official public announcements, leveraging partnerships with government and legal entities. Its business model focuses on advertising and paid featured listings, targeting professionals and organizations involved in tenders and legal processes. The presence of partner logos and references to reputable Polish media and legal sites strengthens its market credibility. The platform's content strategy includes articles and guides, enhancing user engagement and authority. Growth potential lies in expanding paid listings and deepening partnerships. However, the lack of transparent WHOIS data and direct contact details may limit trust for some users. Strategic partnerships with established media brands provide competitive advantages and a strong ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Use of reputable third-party analytics and advertising services is evident, though it introduces some risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. The absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that should be addressed to mitigate risks such as clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which is a compliance and transparency shortfall. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with additional headers and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Enhance WHOIS data transparency or provide domain registration details to increase trustworthiness.
  4. Add explicit company contact emails and phone numbers on the contact page to facilitate user communication and support.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking services to ensure they do not introduce vulnerabilities or privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Artegence SA
Description
Komunikaty.pl is a Polish website providing announcements related to tenders, bailiff auctions, and insolvency notices. It serves as a platform for public and business announcements, including government and legal notices.
Key services
Tender announcements, Bailiff auctions, Insolvency and syndicate notices, Featured paid announcements, Articles and guides related to business and law
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Gemius Analytics, Google DoubleClick for Publishers, SimpleBar (custom scrollbar), Bluewhale tracking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure third-party analytics and ad services

Analytics and tracking

Services
Gemius, Google Analytics (via GTM implied)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, AdviewAdsTag
Tracking pixels
Gemius, Bluewhale
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to public tenders and legal announcements.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance mechanisms are implemented.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page; contact is via a dedicated contact page.
  5. WHOIS data is not publicly available, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. Use of multiple reputable third-party analytics and advertising services.
  7. No security policy or incident response information publicly visible.
  8. No terms of service page detected in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with integrations for Google Tag Manager, Gemius analytics, and OneTrust cookie consent, reflecting a mature technical stack. The site is optimized for mobile devices and employs custom scrollbar libraries for enhanced UI. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external ad and tracking scripts that may impact load times. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Opportunities exist to improve performance by optimizing third-party scripts and enhancing accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with komunikaty.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review komunikaty.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.