Skip to main content

Security report for kokaudzetavabilasti.lv

Kokaudzētava „Bīlasti” · Other · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kokaudzētava „Bīlasti” is a small family-owned plant nursery business based in Latvia, established in 2000. The company specializes in the cultivation and sale of decorative conifers such as junipers, spruces, pines, cypresses, and thuja, along with some deciduous trees and shrubs. With approximately 24 hectares of cultivation area, it is one of the larger nurseries in Latvia, focusing on full-cycle plant growing from cuttings to mature plants. The website reflects a basic but functional online presence with content primarily in Latvian, targeting gardeners, landscapers, and commercial customers in the region.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kokaudzetavabilasti.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the horticulture sector with a niche focus on decorative conifers and container-grown plants. Its family-owned model emphasizes sustainable growing practices without herbicides or fungicides, appealing to environmentally conscious customers. The website's limited digital sophistication and absence of detailed contact information or privacy policies suggest a traditional business with modest online engagement. Partnerships with local entities are hinted at through external links but no formal affiliations are declared. Growth potential may be constrained by limited digital marketing and technical infrastructure.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner, indicating basic compliance with privacy norms. However, it relies on outdated JavaScript libraries (jQuery 1.3.2) with known vulnerabilities and lacks modern security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No privacy policy or terms of service pages are present, which may expose the business to compliance risks under GDPR. The absence of contact information for incident response or security matters further limits security maturity. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires improvements to mitigate common web vulnerabilities and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to current secure versions to eliminate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user transparency.
  4. Add clear and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and support.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to provide a better user experience and meet modern web standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kokaudzētava „Bīlasti”
Description
Kokaudzētava „Bīlasti” dibināta 2000. gadā un atrodas pie Dobeles pilsētas robežas, blakus visiem pazīstamajam P.Upīša ceriņu dārzam un augļkoku stādaudzētavai „Liepas”. Esam viena no lielākajām Latvijas stādaudzētavām ar kopējo platību ap 24ha. Specializējamies dekoratīvo skujkoku audzēšanā - kadiķi, egles, priedes, pacipreses un tūjas lielos daudzumos. Nelielos daudzumos tiek audzēti arī lapu koki un krūmi. Esam ģimenes uzņēmums, kas nodrošina pilna cikla audzēšanu - no spraudeņiem līdz pat gatavam augam, tāpēc varēsim ieteikt labāko tieši Jūsu dārzam. Augi tiek audzēti konteineros un atklātā laukā, tomēr lai nodrošinātu klientiem iespēju augus droši stādīt arī vasaras karstajos periodos, kokaudzētava pievērš lielāku uzmanību stādu audzēšanai tieši konteineros. Audzēšanas procesā netiek lietoti herbicīdi un fungicīdi. Audzējam augus, kas izturīgi Ziemeļeiropas klimatā.
Key services
Cultivation and sale of decorative conifers (junipers, spruces, pines, cypresses, thuja), Cultivation of deciduous trees and shrubs in smaller quantities, Full cycle plant growing from cuttings to mature plants
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.3.2, jQuery Fancybox 1.3.0, jQuery Easing 1.3, jQuery Innerfade, Google Analytics (ga.js), CookieConsent 3.0.3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on main page
  6. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries introduces security risk
  7. Basic SEO and accessibility features present
  8. Business is a small family-owned plant nursery in Latvia
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.3.2 and Fancybox 1.3.0, which are outdated and pose security risks. It uses Google Analytics for tracking and a third-party cookie consent library. The HTML structure is basic with limited SEO optimization and accessibility features. No modern CMS or frameworks are detected. Performance is moderate but could be improved with updated technologies and optimization. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated, requiring modernization to improve security, performance, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kokaudzetavabilasti.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kokaudzetavabilasti.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.