Skip to main content

Security report for kmtp.lt

Kauno technologijos universitetas · Technology · Lithuania

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Klaipėdos mokslo ir technologijų parkas, registered under Kauno technologijos universitetas, is a well-established technology park in Lithuania founded in 2004. It offers scientific research, experimental development, startup support, expert consultations, and infrastructure services to technology-oriented businesses. The organization manages numerous international and national projects, positioning itself as a regional innovation hub with a broad European partner network. The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Divi Builder and various plugins, providing a professional and user-friendly experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, though security headers and incident response policies are lacking. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site reflects a credible and stable institution with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kmtp.lt

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a university-affiliated technology park targeting high value-added and technology companies, startups, and research institutions. Its business model focuses on providing research services, infrastructure, and project leadership, generating revenue through service offerings and project funding. The company benefits from a strong market position supported by long domain registration and university backing. Its partnership ecosystem includes social media channels and European collaborators. Growth indicators include active project management and startup incubation. The website content and structure support clear communication of services and contact points.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. The use of plugins like WP Accessibility and Events Manager indicates attention to usability and functionality but no explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The incomplete configuration of the Google Analytics plugin may pose minor privacy risks. Compliance with GDPR is not clearly demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The security culture could be enhanced by publishing security policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add and configure security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen site security.
  3. Complete configuration of analytics plugins to ensure privacy and data protection.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies including security contact channels.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kauno technologijos universitetas
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kauno technologijos universitetas
Description
Klaipėdos mokslo ir technologijų parkas provides scientific research and experimental development services, supports startups, offers expert consultations and infrastructure services, and manages over 60 international and national projects with a broad partner network.
Key services
Scientific research and experimental development, Startup support and expert consultations, Infrastructure services including office and prototyping spaces, Project management and leadership
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.5, jQuery 3.7.1, jQuery UI 1.13.2, Divi Builder, Events Manager plugin, WP Accessibility plugin, FontAwesome 6.4.0, Google Fonts (Roboto), Google Maps API
Frameworks
WordPress, Divi
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and accessibility plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Lithuanian with English alternate available.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page or metadata.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, physical address, and subscription form.
  5. Social media presence includes Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube official channels.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with Divi theme and multiple plugins for events, accessibility, and subscriptions.
  7. Google Analytics is included but MonsterInsights plugin is not fully configured.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  9. No explicit security or incident response contact information found.
  10. Website design and navigation are professional and user-friendly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Divi Builder theme and multiple plugins for events, accessibility, and email subscriptions. It loads external resources such as Google Fonts, FontAwesome, and Google Maps API. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive design. Accessibility features are basic but present, including an accessibility toolbar. SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags are included but minimal. The site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by optimizing plugin configurations and enhancing security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kmtp.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kmtp.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.