Skip to main content

Security report for klustikaravirs.lv

NBS Rekrutēšanas un atlases centrs · Government · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website klustikaravirs.lv serves as the official recruitment platform for the Latvian National Armed Forces, providing comprehensive information and application options for various military service types including professional service, national defense service, and specialized military education. The site targets Latvian citizens aged 18 to 60 interested in serving their country, positioning itself as a trusted government resource with strong public confidence. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10, employs Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics, and offers a responsive, accessible user experience. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support is a critical security shortfall that undermines user trust and data protection. Additionally, DNS and email security configurations could be enhanced with DNSSEC and DMARC records. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, but no terms of service or security policies are published. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires urgent security improvements to align with best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching klustikaravirs.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
92
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Klustikaravirs.lv operates as a government essential entity focused on military recruitment and education services in Latvia. It leverages official branding and messaging to appeal to a broad demographic of potential recruits. The platform's business model is informational and service-oriented, facilitating voluntary enlistment and education pathways within the national defense sector. Its market position is strong within the Latvian government ecosystem, supported by claims of high public trust. The site integrates modern web technologies and analytics tools while maintaining a clear navigation structure and relevant content. Growth potential lies in expanding digital engagement and improving security posture to foster greater user confidence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a basic security posture with significant vulnerabilities. The lack of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support is a critical issue exposing users to potential interception and undermining data confidentiality. DNSSEC and CAA records are absent, increasing DNS spoofing risks and certificate issuance risks respectively. Email security is partially addressed with SPF and DMARC policies, but the DMARC record is null, limiting protection against spoofing. The site uses HSTS but without HTTPS, this is ineffective. No OCSP stapling or session resumption is enabled, impacting performance and security. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the site requires immediate remediation of SSL/TLS and DNS/email security to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Implement DNSSEC and CAA DNS records to enhance DNS and certificate security.
  4. Publish and enforce a DMARC policy to improve email authentication and reduce spoofing.
  5. Develop and publish clear security and incident response policies to improve transparency and readiness.
  6. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  7. Consider adding terms of service to clarify user rights and obligations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, utilizing standard Drupal core and contributed modules. It employs Matomo analytics with Do Not Track respected, indicating privacy-conscious tracking. The frontend uses jQuery and custom JavaScript for UI interactions. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 4.5 seconds and 50 resources loaded. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with proper ARIA roles and navigation landmarks. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a major technical risk. DNS configuration lacks advanced security features like DNSSEC and CAA. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical stack is modern but security infrastructure requires urgent upgrades.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with klustikaravirs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review klustikaravirs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.