Skip to main content

Security report for klotins.lv

Raivo Klotiņš · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website klotins.lv represents a small legal practice specializing in criminal defense services in Latvia, led by sworn attorney Raivo Klotiņš. The site clearly targets individuals and legal entities involved in criminal proceedings, offering comprehensive legal assistance from pre-trial investigations through all court levels. The business is positioned as a niche provider with a professional and consistent online presence, including social media channels and clear contact information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common web technologies such as jQuery and Leaflet.js for map integration. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a notable compliance gap. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS but lacks additional security headers and formal security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the domain appears legitimate based on website content and contact details. Privacy protection on WHOIS is likely justified for this type of business. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening to improve its risk posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching klotins.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Klotins.lv operates as a specialized legal service provider focusing on criminal law in Latvia. The business model centers on offering expert legal defense and representation in criminal cases, targeting suspects, accused persons, victims, and witnesses. The website's content and social media presence suggest an established, small-scale practice with a clear market niche. Revenue streams likely derive from client legal fees. The firm maintains a professional image but lacks visible certifications or broader partnerships. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the digital presence is consistent with a focused legal consultancy. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the site or linked domains.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with mandatory HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. There is no evidence of a formal security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to meet GDPR requirements and improve user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Improve website accessibility features to broaden usability and comply with accessibility standards.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Raivo Klotiņš
Description
Zvērināts advokāts Raivo Klotiņš specializējas aizdomās turēto un apsūdzēto aizstāvībā kriminālprocesos pirmstiesas izmeklēšanas iestādēs un tiesās, sniedzot juridisko palīdzību gan fiziskām, gan juridiskām personām.
Key services
Criminal defense representation, Legal assistance in pre-trial investigations, Representation in various Latvian courts, Legal help for suspects, accused, victims, and witnesses
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Leaflet.js, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional legal service site for a Latvian criminal defense lawyer.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with clear contact details and social media presence.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No visible security headers beyond HTTPS.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  6. No advertising or tracking services detected.
  7. Site uses WordPress CMS with common libraries and Google Fonts.
  8. Site includes an embedded Leaflet map showing office location.
  9. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via email or phone.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS version 6.8.2, utilizing jQuery 3.7.1 and Leaflet.js 1.3.4 for interactive map features. Google Fonts (Roboto and Roboto Slab) are loaded asynchronously for typography. The site uses standard HTML5 and CSS3 with custom styles for branding consistency. Performance is moderate with caching and autoptimize plugins evident from asset URLs. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. SEO is basic with canonical links and RSS feeds but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph metadata. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small professional website but could benefit from enhanced SEO and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with klotins.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review klotins.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.