Skip to main content

Security report for klopp.law

Klopp Law · Other · United States

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Klopp Law is a veteran-owned criminal defense law firm based in Reading, Pennsylvania, specializing in defending clients against serious criminal charges such as drug offenses, gun cases, assaults, and DUI. The firm positions itself as a dedicated and aggressive advocate for clients in eastern Pennsylvania, emphasizing personalized legal representation and thorough case preparation. The website reflects a small but professional legal practice with a clear focus on criminal defense services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the PaperStreet theme framework, incorporating modern web technologies such as jQuery, Swiper.js for sliders, and lazy loading for images. SEO is well addressed with Yoast SEO plugin integration and proper meta tags. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Hosting is likely through GoDaddy, consistent with the domain registrar information. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data in the HTML. However, it lacks DNSSEC, visible security headers, and dedicated security or incident response policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. The domain WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, showing no privacy protection and a legitimate registration history. Overall, Klopp Law's website is a solid representation of a small legal practice with good business credibility and technical implementation but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching klopp.law

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Klopp Law operates as a small, specialized criminal defense law firm targeting individuals facing criminal charges in eastern Pennsylvania. The firm leverages its veteran-owned status as a trust and differentiation factor. Its business model focuses on personalized legal services with aggressive defense strategies. The website integrates client management and payment portals via Clio, indicating a modern approach to client engagement and operational efficiency. The firm maintains partnerships with legal service platforms and a professional web design company, supporting its market presence. Growth indicators include a relatively new domain and active client scheduling features. The firm’s competitive advantage lies in its focused expertise and veteran-owned branding in a localized market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of DNSSEC and HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which is a gap for a legal services provider handling sensitive client data. The site does not expose sensitive information or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided data. Privacy compliance is lacking, with no cookie consent or privacy policy, which could expose the firm to regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies and implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Klopp Law
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Klopp Law
Description
Klopp Law is a veteran-owned criminal defense firm serving clients in eastern Pennsylvania to achieve optimal results in criminal cases involving drugs, guns, assaults, and other serious offenses.
Key services
Criminal defense, Drug cases, Gun cases, Conspiracy cases, Assaults, DUI defense
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Swiper.js, FontAwesome, Lity lightbox, Lozad lazy loading
Frameworks
PaperStreet theme framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of external scripts with integrity via trusted CDNs

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Marketing tools
Clio Grow (client scheduling), Clio (client login and payment)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured for a small law firm.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented but no email contact found on the site.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies implemented.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. External links mostly to trusted legal service platforms and design partners.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the PaperStreet theme framework, enhanced with popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. SEO is managed via the Yoast SEO plugin, with well-structured metadata and JSON-LD schema for rich search results. The site uses lazy loading for images (Lozad) and a lightbox library (Lity) to optimize performance and user experience. Hosting appears to be through GoDaddy, consistent with the domain registrar. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features, though accessibility could be improved. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a small law firm, but there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with klopp.law. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review klopp.law.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.