Skip to main content

Security report for kleyrgrasso.com

KLEYR GRASSO · Other · Luxembourg

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KLEYR GRASSO is an independent full-service business and litigation law firm based in Luxembourg with over 30 years of experience. The firm targets both international and domestic clients, offering expert legal guidance from project inception to implementation. The website reflects a professional legal services provider with a clear focus on business law and litigation. Technically, the site employs a modern frontend stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy and terms of service documentation. Overall, the website is accessible, professionally designed, and trustworthy, though it would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 21 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kleyrgrasso.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm positions itself as a reputable legal service provider in Luxembourg, serving a niche market of business and litigation clients. Its business model is that of an independent law firm with a multicultural team, suggesting a focus on personalized and expert legal services. The absence of explicit contact details and social media presence on the analyzed page may limit direct client engagement online. The website content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a credible market presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain or website content. The firm appears to maintain a stable domain registration with a reputable registrar, supporting business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly configured, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents missed opportunities to harden security. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and handling of security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional measures and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve site security.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  4. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for client engagement and incident reporting.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response policy and security contact channels to improve security readiness and transparency.

Contact details published on the site

VAT number
LU29909555
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KLEYR GRASSO
Description
With 30 years of excellence, our independent full-service business and litigation law firm in Luxembourg supports international and domestic clients. Our dedicated, multicultural team ensures expert guidance from project inception to implementation.
Key services
Business law, Litigation, Legal advisory
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Cookiebot Consent Management, Lightbox2 2.11.3, CKEditor 4.22.1, FilePond 4.x, Google Fonts (Figtree, Bodoni Moda, Poppins), Font Awesome 6.3.0, Boxicons 2.0.7, Bootstrap 4.5.2, Select2 4.1.0-rc.0, Slick Carousel 1.8.1
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for a law firm.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with a visible dialog.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. No social media links detected in the provided content.
  6. Multiple modern frontend libraries and fonts used indicating moderate technical maturity.
  7. HTTPS is enabled; no security headers detected in provided data.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is registered with a reputable registrar and is not privacy protected.
  9. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms; content fully accessible.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of popular frontend libraries and frameworks such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and CKEditor, along with modern fonts and icon sets. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, indicating attention to privacy compliance. The site loads resources from reputable CDNs, which supports performance and reliability. Mobile optimization appears good based on viewport meta tags and responsive CSS frameworks. However, no CMS or backend platform was detected from the provided data. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing resource loading and implementing caching strategies. Accessibility features are basic, with room for enhancement to meet higher standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kleyrgrasso.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kleyrgrasso.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.