Skip to main content

Security report for kleinwenner.eu

klein•wenner · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

klein•wenner is a small, multicultural law firm specializing in business law with an international reach, formed by the merger of KGA Avocats and Wenner. The website presents a professional image with a clear focus on business law services targeting international clients and business professionals. The firm positions itself as a multicultural entity with expertise in business law, although detailed business information such as founding year or company size is not explicitly provided. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, incorporating SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO and Google Analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The technical infrastructure is standard for a professional service website, with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and some privacy mechanisms like cookie consent in place, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or security policies. No contact information or incident response details are found, which limits direct communication channels for security or business inquiries. Overall, the website is professional and safe but could improve in transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kleinwenner.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kleinwenner.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for kleinwenner.eu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates in the legal services sector, focusing on business law with an international client base. Its business model is service-oriented, providing legal expertise to businesses. The merger origin suggests strategic growth and multicultural positioning as competitive advantages. The website lacks detailed information on revenue streams or partnerships, but the use of common digital marketing and analytics tools indicates an awareness of online presence management. The absence of explicit contact details and certifications may limit trust signals for potential clients. The firm targets business professionals and international clients, positioning itself as a niche player in the legal market. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of Google Analytics with an opt-out mechanism shows some privacy consideration. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small professional website but requires enhancements to meet higher security standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement standard security headers to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
klein•wenner
Description
Formed through the merging of KGA Avocats and Wenner, klein•wenner is a multicultural law firm specialising in business law with an international reach/influence .
Key services
business law
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO, MonsterInsights, Font Awesome, jQuery
Frameworks
Divi Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Analytics opt-out mechanism present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page or linked resources.
  3. Cookie policy is implemented with consent mechanism.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with Divi theme and common SEO and analytics plugins.
  6. HTTPS is enabled with Google Analytics tracking configured.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  9. Content is professional and relevant to a law firm specializing in business law.
  10. No adult or explicit content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Divi theme, a popular and flexible framework for professional sites. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates Google Analytics via MonsterInsights for traffic analysis. SEO is managed through the Yoast SEO plugin, indicating attention to search engine visibility. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs such as fonts.gstatic.com and maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization techniques detected. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements present. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. The technical stack is standard for a small professional service website, with opportunities to enhance security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kleinwenner.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kleinwenner.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.