Skip to main content

Security report for klasco.lt

Other · Lithuania

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at klasco.lt is currently inaccessible in terms of meaningful content due to an active anti-bot CAPTCHA challenge and obfuscated JavaScript designed to prevent automated access. This limits the ability to extract business, security, or compliance information from the site. The domain is registered with Telia Lietuva, AB, a reputable Lithuanian registrar, with a creation date in 2015, indicating a legitimate and established domain. However, the lack of visible content, policies, or contact information on the accessible page significantly reduces the site's transparency and trustworthiness. From a technical perspective, the site uses JavaScript heavily for its anti-bot measures but lacks visible modern web technologies, SEO optimization, or accessibility features. The hosting provider is linked to the registrar, suggesting local hosting in Lithuania. Security posture is weak due to the absence of visible HTTPS confirmation and security headers in the accessible content. Overall, the site presents a high risk from a user trust and compliance standpoint due to the absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as contact information. The anti-bot measures, while improving security against automated abuse, also hinder legitimate analysis and user experience. Strategic improvements are needed to balance security with accessibility and compliance. Recommendations include implementing clear privacy and cookie policies, providing contact information, improving technical SEO and accessibility, and ensuring security best practices such as HTTPS and security headers are in place.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching klasco.lt

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible business content, detailed business intelligence is limited. The domain registration indicates a Lithuanian entity with a domain age consistent with a small or medium-sized business. No explicit company name, description, or services are presented on the accessible page. The site appears to be protected by anti-bot mechanisms, possibly indicating a concern for spam or abuse. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or related domains are identified from the accessible content. The business model and market positioning cannot be determined from the current data.

Security posture

The website employs obfuscated JavaScript and CAPTCHA challenges to prevent automated access, which is a positive security measure against bots and spam. However, the lack of visible HTTPS confirmation, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies indicate a low maturity in security and compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The site does not expose sensitive data in the accessible content, but the obfuscation and blocking limit transparency. Overall, the security posture is weak to moderate, with room for significant improvement in compliance and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and clearly display privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  2. Provide visible and verified contact information including email and phone numbers for business credibility and incident response.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured and security headers are implemented to enhance security posture.
  4. Balance anti-bot measures with user accessibility to avoid blocking legitimate users and improve user experience.
  5. Develop a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate transparency and readiness for security incidents.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website content is blocked by an anti-bot or security challenge mechanism with CAPTCHA and obfuscated JavaScript, preventing full content access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript
Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to CAPTCHA and obfuscated JavaScript anti-bot measures.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details are presented on the accessible page.
  4. WHOIS data is consistent and indicates a legitimate registration.
  5. Technical implementation is minimal and lacks modern web standards and SEO optimization.
  6. Security posture is weak due to lack of visible HTTPS confirmation and security headers.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in accessible content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses JavaScript extensively, primarily for anti-bot CAPTCHA and obfuscation. No modern frameworks or CMS are detected. Hosting is provided by Telia Lietuva, AB, a Lithuanian registrar and hosting provider. The site lacks SEO meta tags, accessibility features, and mobile optimization. Performance is likely slow due to obfuscated scripts and lack of optimization. No analytics or marketing tools are detected. The technical implementation is minimal and focused on blocking automated access rather than providing rich user content or features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with klasco.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review klasco.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.