Skip to main content

Security report for kjr-hof.de

Kreisjugendring Hof · Government · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kreisjugendring Hof is a regional non-profit organization affiliated with the Bayerischer Jugendring, focused on youth work and community engagement in the Hof district of Germany. The website provides detailed information about youth programs, training courses like Juleica, event organization, and equipment rental services. The organization targets youth, volunteers, and families, positioning itself as a key regional player in youth development and support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Elementor and Slider Revolution, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS for performance and security. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and accessible, with a good level of SEO and privacy compliance including GDPR-aligned cookie consent and a privacy policy. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved and a vulnerability disclosure mechanism is absent. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and serves its community effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kjr-hof.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
48
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the government and non-profit sectors, providing youth services and educational programs. Its business model is service-oriented, relying on event hosting, training, and community support. The website reflects a stable regional presence with partnerships including the Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung and federal funding programs. The target audience includes youth aged 6-26, volunteers, and local families. The site content and event announcements indicate active community engagement and growth potential. The use of WordPress and common plugins suggests a cost-effective digital infrastructure. No direct revenue streams or commercial activities are evident, consistent with non-profit status.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS, indicating a baseline secure configuration. No critical security issues or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. However, some recommended security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected and should be implemented to enhance protection. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page limits transparency for security researchers. Contact forms are present but no explicit anti-spam or advanced security controls were identified. Overall, the security posture is good for a non-commercial site but could be improved with additional headers and formal vulnerability disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance contact forms with anti-spam and input validation mechanisms.
  5. Consider publishing terms of service to clarify user and visitor rights.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kreisjugendring Hof
Description
Der Kreisjugendring Hof ist eine Untergliederung des Bayerischen Jugendrings, die Jugendarbeit und Jugendförderung im Landkreis Hof organisiert und unterstützt. Die Organisation bietet Jugendfreizeiten, Schulungen (z.B. Juleica), Veranstaltungen, Verleih von Equipment wie Fotoboxen, und unterstützt Jugendverbände und Ehrenamtliche.
Key services
Jugendfreizeiten (summer camps, winter camps), Jugendleiter-Schulungen (Juleica), Equipment Verleih (Fotobox), Veranstaltungen und Workshops, Förderung und Unterstützung von Jugendverbänden
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.1.9, PHP, jQuery, Slider Revolution 6.6.7, Contact Form 7, Elementor, Page Builder plugin, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and CDN
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional non-profit youth organization site with comprehensive event and service information.
  2. Content is in German and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and themes.
  4. No signs of malicious content or security issues in the HTML content.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  6. No explicit terms of service page found.
  7. Contact information is available but no physical address explicitly extracted from provided content.
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  9. No social media links explicitly found except Instagram embedded images and links.
  10. No analytics scripts like Google Analytics detected in provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.1.9 with Elementor, Slider Revolution, Contact Form 7, and other common plugins. It uses jQuery 3.6.1 and Font Awesome for UI elements. Hosting is behind Cloudflare DNS, likely providing CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility tools such as an accessibility toolbar. Performance is moderate with some heavy slider assets but overall good structure. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and RSS feeds. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are missing. The site uses Google Fonts and external resources from trusted domains. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for the organization's needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kjr-hof.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kjr-hof.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.