Skip to main content

Security report for kit-ar.com

KIT-AR · Manufacturing · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KIT-AR is a specialized technology company providing augmented reality solutions for quality assurance in manufacturing environments. Their platform aims to reduce costs and errors on the shopfloor by digitizing quality assurance processes and upskilling workers. The company targets manufacturing sectors such as automotive, aerospace, and electronics, positioning itself as a niche B2B provider with a focus on continuous improvement and digital transformation. The website presents professional branding, case studies with reputable clients, and clear calls to action, indicating a mature business presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins and frameworks such as Genesis Framework, Slider Revolution, and Yoast SEO. It employs Google reCAPTCHA for form security and Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements anti-bot measures but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No privacy or cookie policies were found, representing a compliance gap with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Contact information is clearly provided, but no formal security or incident response policies are published. Overall, KIT-AR's website reflects a credible and professional business with solid technical foundations but could improve its privacy compliance and security posture. Strategic recommendations include publishing privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kit-ar.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KIT-AR operates in the manufacturing technology sector, focusing on augmented reality applications for quality assurance. Their competitive advantage lies in integrating AR to reduce Costs of Poor Quality (CoPQ) and improve worker training and continuous improvement programs. The business model is B2B SaaS and services, targeting manufacturing companies seeking digital transformation. Revenue likely derives from platform subscriptions and consulting. The presence of case studies with major industry players like Airbus and Comau indicates strong partnerships and market validation. The company appears to be small-sized, founded in 2018, with a focused product offering and a clear value proposition. Their digital presence is professional, supporting growth and customer acquisition efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 is used to protect forms from spam and abuse. Analytics are handled via Matomo, a privacy-respecting platform. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or security certifications. These gaps could expose the business to DNS spoofing, clickjacking, or other web-based attacks. Addressing these issues would strengthen trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  3. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KIT-AR
Description
Reduce time and costs spent fixing errors on your manufacturing shopfloor with quality assurance and augmented reality
Key services
Augmented reality quality assurance platform, Kitting & Packing solutions, Worker upskilling, Continuous improvement support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Slider Revolution, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, Genesis Framework, Ultimate Blocks, Matomo Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Genesis Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Matomo analytics self-hosted for privacy

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional B2B platform focused on augmented reality for manufacturing quality assurance.
  2. Content is well structured with clear calls to action and case studies.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Security posture is decent but could be improved with DNSSEC and security headers.
  5. Uses modern WordPress plugins and frameworks with some customizations.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Twitter is active.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with a well-chosen set of plugins for SEO, forms, and content presentation. The use of Slider Revolution and Genesis Framework indicates a focus on design and user experience. Hosting and DNS are managed by Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile-optimized. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers suggests some technical debt in security hardening. The site uses Matomo for analytics, which is a positive privacy-conscious choice. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from security enhancements and improved privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kit-ar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kit-ar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.