KiSoft connect is a partner program operated by KNAPP, a large technology company specializing in logistics software solutions. The website promotes software products and partnership opportunities for companies to market and implement KiSoft software independently. The business model focuses on partner certification, training, and ongoing support with a commission-based licensing approach. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins for multilingual support, SEO, and cookie consent. However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not serve content over HTTPS, which is a critical security flaw. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented properly, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the website is professional and targets companies interested in logistics software partnerships but suffers from slow performance and security weaknesses.
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
70
Email security
50
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
64
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention kisoft-connect.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for kisoft-connect.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company positions itself as a technology partner in the logistics industry, leveraging the KiSoft software brand to enable partners to expand their portfolio and market reach. The partner program offers access to proven software with over 3,000 installations worldwide, emphasizing independence and risk-free product development for partners. The target audience includes software companies and integrators seeking to implement logistics solutions. The business benefits from KNAPP's established reputation and global presence. The website content and testimonials reinforce trust and professionalism, although direct contact information is limited to email and forms. The partnership ecosystem is supported by structured onboarding and account management.
Security posture
The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No security headers are present, and modern TLS protocols are not enabled. While cookie consent is managed via a reputable plugin, the lack of encryption and security best practices significantly lowers the security score. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities like subdomain takeover. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues is critical to improve security and user trust.
Recommendations
Obtain and deploy a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
Configure and enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
Implement security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, and X-Frame-Options.
Improve website performance by optimizing resource loading and reducing load time.
Add explicit terms of service and security policy pages to enhance transparency and compliance.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder and several plugins including Contact Form 7 and Borlabs Cookie for GDPR compliance. The tech stack includes jQuery and video.js for media content. Hosting appears to be managed via DomainDiscount24 based on DNS NS records. Performance is slow with a high number of resources and large page size. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. However, the lack of HTTPS and security headers represents a significant technical risk. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing but does not include social media links or phone contact details.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with kisoft-connect.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kisoft-connect.com.