Skip to main content

Security report for kiskane.se

Kristensson i Skåne AB · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kristensson i Skåne AB is a specialized consulting firm founded in 2014, focusing on IT and information security, project management, and strategic IT management. The company targets businesses in regulated sectors requiring tailored IT security solutions. Their website reflects a professional small business with a consistent brand and clear contact information, though lacking formal privacy and cookie policies. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Analytics are implemented via Plausible, indicating a privacy-conscious approach with minimal tracking. However, the absence of security headers and formal privacy compliance mechanisms suggests room for improvement in security posture. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The domain registration aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices. The risk level is moderate with recommendations to implement privacy and cookie policies, add security headers, and establish incident response contacts to improve compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kiskane.se

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kristensson i Skåne AB operates as a niche IT consulting firm in Sweden, focusing on information security and strategic IT management. Their competitive advantage lies in serving highly regulated sectors with tailored solutions and a strong emphasis on efficiency and compliance. The business model is service-based consulting, targeting organizations needing expert IT security and project management support. The company demonstrates growth potential through community engagement and sustainability focus. The website content and registration data indicate a stable, small-sized enterprise with clear market positioning. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Analytics usage is minimal and privacy-friendly, but overall security best practices need strengthening. No immediate vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, but the site would benefit from a security audit and policy implementations to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible on the website.
  2. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  3. Configure and deploy essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish an incident response contact or security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and response.
  5. Regularly audit third-party plugins and scripts to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kristensson i Skåne AB
VAT number
SE556963231701
Registration number
556963-2317
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kristensson i Skåne AB
Description
Kristensson i Skåne AB is specialized in delivering high-quality consulting services in IT and information security, project management, and strategic IT advice. Founded in 2014, the company has built a strong reputation in highly regulated sectors, offering tailored solutions to meet complex challenges. Their team is committed to efficiency, structure, and integrating new regulations and standards into client-specific solutions. With a focus on sustainability and community support, Kristensson i Skåne AB continues to grow and innovate in the IT and information security industry.
Key services
Information Security, IT Security (Cybersecurity), Project Management, Strategic IT Management, IT Technical Expertise
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Open Sans), Unslider Image Plugin, Modernizr, WordPress
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
plausible.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based consulting firm site focused on IT and information security.
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics with minimal tracking.
  6. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. No forms detected on the homepage; contact page likely contains forms but not analyzed here.
  8. Company provides detailed business registration and financial information in footer.
  9. No social media links found in the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Font Awesome. It uses Google Fonts for typography and the Unslider plugin for image slideshows. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta viewport and robots tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site uses Plausible Analytics, indicating a focus on privacy-friendly tracking. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing privacy compliance features, which should be addressed to reduce potential vulnerabilities and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kiskane.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kiskane.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.