Skip to main content

Security report for kinomaja.lv

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain www.rijafilms.com appears to be unregistered or expired as indicated by the WHOIS raw data showing 'No match for domain'. The website content provided is incomplete and truncated, lacking critical elements such as privacy policies, contact information, or business descriptions. This severely limits the ability to assess the business operations or technical infrastructure. No security policies, incident response contacts, or certifications are found, indicating a lack of publicly available compliance or security posture information. The absence of WHOIS registration data and website content suggests the domain is inactive or placeholder, posing a significant risk for trust and legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include verifying domain registration status, ensuring website content availability, and publishing essential compliance and contact information to improve credibility and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kinomaja.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kinomaja.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kinomaja.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the domain's apparent unregistered status and lack of accessible content, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. There is no evidence of market positioning, business model, or partnership ecosystem. The site appears intended for film/media content based on the URL path, but no further details are available. The lack of contact details and business information suggests the business is either inactive or not publicly established.

Security posture

No security headers, SSL configuration details, or security policies are detected. The absence of WHOIS registration data and website content indicates a critical security risk as the domain may be expired or unowned, which can be exploited for phishing or malicious purposes. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. The security posture is effectively non-existent based on available data.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and renew domain registration to establish ownership and legitimacy.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with regulations.
  3. Implement and document security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Ensure website content is fully accessible and includes clear business and contact information.
  5. Adopt security best practices such as HTTPS, security headers, and secure forms to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

None detected. WHOIS data indicates domain does not exist or is not registered. The HTML content is truncated and incomplete, indicating content is minimal or blocked. No WAF challenge detected explicitly but content is inaccessible or missing. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data shows domain is not registered or expired.
  2. Website content is incomplete and truncated, indicating possible blocking or minimal content.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the accessible content.
  4. No contact information or business details found.
  5. No security policies or incident response contacts detected.
  6. No analytics or advertising technologies detected due to incomplete content.
  7. No external or partner domains identified.
  8. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  9. No social media or email contacts found.
  10. No security headers or SSL configuration details available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Wix platform as indicated by meta tags and script sources. However, the provided HTML content is truncated and incomplete, limiting technical assessment. No detailed tech stack or performance data is available. No analytics or advertising technologies are detected. The site lacks visible SEO optimization and accessibility features in the accessible content. Hosting provider and CMS are inferred as Wix but no further infrastructure details are available.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kinomaja.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kinomaja.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.