Skip to main content

Security report for kgk.ee

KGK Estonia · Other · Estonia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KGK Estonia operates a professional website primarily targeting Estonian-speaking users. The company has maintained its domain since 2010, indicating a stable presence. The website is built on WordPress and integrates modern technologies such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The site implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms and provides detailed cookie declarations, demonstrating attention to privacy compliance. However, explicit privacy and security policies are not directly hosted on the site, relying instead on external Cookiebot links. No direct contact information or incident response contacts are visible, which may limit user trust and support accessibility. The technical infrastructure is hosted by DBWeb OÜ, consistent with the domain registration data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kgk.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KGK Estonia appears to be a small-sized entity operating in an unspecified sector, likely providing services or products to local Estonian customers. The website's professional design and consistent branding suggest a focus on maintaining a credible online presence. The use of Google marketing and analytics tools indicates an interest in tracking user engagement and optimizing marketing efforts. The absence of explicit business descriptions or contact details limits deeper insights into the business model or market positioning. The domain age and registration consistency support legitimacy, but the lack of visible certifications or trust badges suggests room for enhanced credibility signals.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a reputable consent management platform (Cookiebot), which are positive security indicators. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided content, and there is no visible security or incident response policy. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML, and no vulnerable libraries were identified. The security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional HTTP security headers, publishing security policies, and providing clear incident response contacts. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy is a gap in transparency and security readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit privacy, security, and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add clear and verified contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and a vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible security reporting and improve security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KGK Estonia
Description
KGK Estonia is a company presumably operating in Estonia, with a website in Estonian language. The site content and metadata do not provide explicit business description but the company appears to be established and operating with a professional web presence.
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie declarations
  3. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
  6. No explicit privacy or security policy pages found on the site except external Cookiebot privacy policy link
  7. WHOIS data shows domain is paid, active, and registered since 2010 with DBWeb OÜ
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance. The hosting provider is DBWeb OÜ, consistent with domain registration data. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and more comprehensive accessibility features to improve overall technical robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kgk.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kgk.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.