Skip to main content

Security report for kggroup.eu

AB Kauno Grūdai · Manufacturing · Lithuania

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AB Kauno Grūdai is a leading Lithuanian food and feed production company with a rich history spanning approximately 130 years. The company operates in multiple sectors including flour and flour products, ready-to-eat foods, compound feeds, veterinary pharmaceuticals, and pest control products. It is part of the larger AB Akola group, which is publicly traded on Nasdaq Vilnius and has annual revenues around 2 billion euros. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as Nuxt.js and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and professionally designed, targeting both B2B and B2C audiences in Lithuania and the Baltic region. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kggroup.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as one of the largest food and feed producers in Lithuania, supported by a diversified product portfolio and subsidiaries in Latvia and Poland. Their business model includes manufacturing, wholesale, retail, and veterinary services. The presence of multiple brands and partner sites indicates a broad partnership ecosystem. Revenue and employee statistics suggest a large enterprise scale. Certifications such as 'Top Employer' reinforce their reputation and employer branding. The website content is comprehensive and targeted at customers, partners, and potential employees, indicating a strategic approach to market communication and growth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and cookie consent management. However, explicit security policies or incident response contacts are not published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is a gap in security maturity. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional formal security documentation and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AB Kauno Grūdai
Registration number
133818917
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AB Kauno Grūdai
Description
Viena didžiausių maisto produktų ir pašarų gamybos bendrovių Lietuvoje, kurios malūno istorija siekia 130 metų. Veiklos kryptys apima miltų, greitai paruošiamų produktų, vartojimui paruoštų produktų, kombinuotųjų pašarų ir premiksų gamybą, naminių gyvūnų maisto gamybą, prekybą žaliavomis, veterinarinės farmacijos bei kenkėjų kontrolės ir higienos prekių paslaugas.
Key services
Miltų ir miltų produktų gamyba, Greitai paruošiami produktai, Kombinuotieji pašarai ir premiksai, Naminių gyvūnų pašarai, Veterinarinė farmacija, Prekyba žaliavomis, Kenkėjų kontrolės ir higienos prekės
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js (Nuxt.js), Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian.
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  3. Clear and multiple contact methods including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response contact found.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. Good branding consistency and professional design.
  8. Multiple subsidiaries and partner links clearly presented.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, specifically Nuxt.js (Vue.js), which supports server-side rendering and good SEO practices. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, and Google Tag Manager is implemented for analytics and tracking. The site loads multiple preloaded scripts and uses Swiper.js for sliders. The backend appears to be powered by Strapi CMS, inferred from API URL patterns and JSON data structures. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses SVG and modern font-face declarations for consistent branding. There is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kggroup.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kggroup.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.