Skip to main content

Security report for keystrokepro.com

Keystroke Pro · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in DNS health, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Keystroke Pro is a small outsourcing service provider specializing in audio transcription, accounting, recruitment, and virtual staffing services. The company positions itself as a leading expert in these niches, offering bespoke and confidential solutions to business clients. The website content is professional and business-focused, targeting organizations seeking outsourcing efficiencies. Technically, the site uses older JavaScript libraries such as MooTools, integrates Google Analytics for tracking, and displays a Comodo SSL seal indicating HTTPS security. However, the site lacks modern security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for compliance and security posture. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern, as it undermines trust and raises questions about domain legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional with moderate technical maturity but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching keystrokepro.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the outsourcing sector, focusing on transcription, accounting, and recruitment services. Its business model revolves around providing tailored, rapid turnaround services in a secure environment. The presence of ISO 27001 certification and GDPR privacy statements indicates an awareness of security and compliance requirements. The target market includes businesses needing data entry and virtual staffing solutions. The website's moderate content quality and basic technical implementation suggest a small-sized enterprise with room for digital maturity growth. The lack of explicit contact information and missing WHOIS data may hinder customer trust and business credibility. No clear partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a valid Comodo SSL certificate, which is a positive security indicator. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are essential to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The use of older JavaScript libraries like MooTools could pose potential security risks if not regularly updated. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The GDPR privacy statement and ISO 27001 certification suggest some level of security governance, but the absence of cookie consent and contact channels for security incidents indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and customer trust.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Develop and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to demonstrate security maturity and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Keystroke Pro
Description
Keystroke Pro is a leading outsourcing expert in Audio Transcription, Accounting and Recruitment Industry Services, providing rapid turnaround within a secure and confidential environment with bespoke services tailored to client needs.
Key services
Audio Transcription, Accounting, Recruitment Services, Virtual Staffing, Data Entry
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, MooTools, Google Analytics, Comodo TrustLogo
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Comodo SSL certificate
  • GDPR privacy statement

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. WHOIS data missing, unusual for active domain
  4. Basic privacy and security policies present
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed
  6. Use of dated JavaScript libraries (MooTools)
  7. No cookie consent mechanism found
  8. Limited SEO and accessibility features
  9. Presence of Google Analytics for tracking
  10. ISO 27001 certification claimed and Comodo SSL seal displayed
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy JavaScript frameworks (MooTools) alongside Google Analytics for user tracking. The HTML structure is basic with multiple CSS files for styling but lacks modern responsive design features, resulting in only basic mobile optimization. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the source. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or caching. SEO is basic with meta keywords and description present but no Open Graph or structured data markup. Accessibility features are minimal. The site uses HTTPS with a Comodo SSL certificate and displays a trust seal, which is positive. However, the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt and compliance gaps. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated and could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with keystrokepro.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review keystrokepro.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.