Skip to main content

Security report for keurmerk.info

Stichting Webshop Keurmerk · E-commerce · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.keurmerk.info represents Stichting Webshop Keurmerk, a Dutch organization providing a certification mark for trustworthy webshops compliant with consumer protection laws. The site targets Dutch consumers and webshop owners seeking to demonstrate compliance and reliability. The business model centers on certification and offering a free review system for members, positioning itself as a recognized trustmark in the Dutch e-commerce sector. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Google reCAPTCHA implemented. While the site is accessible and well-structured with good SEO metadata and structured data, some technical aspects like security headers and analytics configuration could be improved. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled and reCAPTCHA in place, but lacks advanced headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or malformed requests, but the domain age and content consistency support legitimacy. Overall, the site is moderately secure and credible but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching keurmerk.info

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Stichting Webshop Keurmerk operates in the e-commerce certification niche within the Netherlands, providing a trusted quality mark for online shops. Its competitive advantage lies in its original status as a webshop keurmerk and its free unlimited review system for members, fostering consumer trust. The business model likely involves membership fees or certification charges, targeting webshop owners and consumers seeking assurance. The website content and metadata indicate a focus on Dutch consumers and compliance with Dutch consumer law. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. The organization appears small but specialized, with a consistent brand and clear trust signals. The lack of public WHOIS data is typical for privacy protection and does not detract from business credibility. The site’s marketing and analytics tools are minimal, suggesting a focus on organic reach and trust-based growth.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating basic security awareness. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms represents a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in case of security events. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is reasonable for this business type but reduces transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, formal privacy and cookie policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Configure Google Analytics properly or remove unused analytics plugins to avoid unnecessary data collection.
  4. Publish clear security and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stichting Webshop Keurmerk
Description
Veilig en betrouwbaar winkelen doet u bij de winkels die zijn aangesloten bij de Stichting Webshop Keurmerk, het originele webwinkelkeurmerk waar de winkels voldoen aan de consumentenwetgeving en waar regels wel worden nageleefd. Gratis onbeperkt reviewsysteem voor leden.
Key services
Webshop certification, Consumer protection compliance, Review system for members
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google reCAPTCHA, Yoast SEO, MonsterInsights (not configured), Google Language Translator
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Divi Builder
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or malformed request
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content
  5. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and common plugins
  6. Google Analytics plugin present but not configured
  7. Good SEO metadata and structured data present
  8. No security headers detected in provided data
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  10. Content is in Dutch language targeting Dutch consumers
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, leveraging popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and icons from FontAwesome. The presence of Google Language Translator indicates multilingual support or translation facilitation. The MonsterInsights plugin is installed but not configured, indicating incomplete analytics setup. The site appears moderately performant with responsive design and accessibility features such as an accessibility toolbar. However, no advanced hosting or CDN information was detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with keurmerk.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review keurmerk.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.