Skip to main content

Security report for ketel1.nl

KETEL 1 · Other · Netherlands

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KETEL 1 is a premium Dutch gin brand with a well-structured website built on WordPress, leveraging modern SEO and compliance tools such as Yoast SEO and Cookiebot. The company targets mature consumers interested in quality spirits, offering products like KETEL 1 Original and Signature Blend. The website demonstrates a good level of digital maturity with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though additional security headers and policies could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is well addressed through Cookiebot and a comprehensive privacy policy, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, with no critical security or compliance gaps detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ketel1.nl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the premium alcoholic beverage sector, focusing on gin production and sales. Its market positioning emphasizes quality and heritage, appealing to discerning consumers. The business model appears to be direct product sales supported by brand marketing. While contact information is limited on the site, the presence of Cookiebot and Google Analytics indicates a mature approach to user data and marketing. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified. The company maintains consistent branding and good content quality, supporting a strong market presence in the Netherlands.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management, including blocking mode and IP anonymization in Google Analytics. However, no advanced security headers were detected, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analyzed content. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional best practices and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KETEL 1
Description
KETEL 1 is a brand focused on producing and selling alcoholic beverages, specifically Dutch gin products such as KETEL 1 Original and KETEL 1 Signature Blend.
Key services
Production and sale of gin products, Brand marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Cookiebot, Google Analytics, WP Store Locator plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with blocking mode
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Mailcampaigns
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and Cookiebot for compliance
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage or cookie dialog
  4. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found
  5. Good GDPR compliance indicators via Cookiebot and privacy policy
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  8. Website content is professional and targeted at mature audience due to alcohol products
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with the Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management. It uses Google Analytics with IP anonymization to track user behavior responsibly. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted third-party domains. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization and responsive design in place. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details were not explicitly found in the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and compliant online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ketel1.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ketel1.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.