Skip to main content

Security report for keskkonnaprojekt.ee

OÜ Keskkonnaprojekt · Government · Estonia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OÜ Keskkonnaprojekt is an Estonian engineering and consulting company specializing in comprehensive design and project management services for buildings, infrastructure, and environmental facilities. The company serves primarily public sector clients and private enterprises within Estonia, offering integrated solutions from initial concept through technical execution. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear service offerings and client references. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as WPML for multilingual support and uses standard JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Flexslider. The site is HTTPS secured and moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, though accessibility and SEO could be improved. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and WP Statistics, but no cookie consent or privacy policies are evident. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and lacks visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks security headers and formal security policies such as incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business identity, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching keskkonnaprojekt.ee

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the government and infrastructure sectors, providing essential engineering and consulting services. Its market position is that of a small but established regional player with a strong client base in public institutions. The business model is project-based, focusing on delivering comprehensive design and supervision services. The website content and client references indicate a stable partnership ecosystem with several municipal and state agencies. Growth indicators are not explicit but the company’s diversified service portfolio and multilingual website suggest ambitions to serve a broad client base. Strategic observations include the need to formalize privacy and security policies to align with EU regulations and enhance competitive positioning.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate to good, with HTTPS enforced and no obvious vulnerabilities in the front-end code. The absence of security headers and vulnerability disclosure policies represents a compliance gap. No incident response contacts or security frameworks are mentioned, indicating limited formal security governance. Data protection practices are not explicitly documented, and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which may expose the company to GDPR compliance risks. The use of common WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate potential vulnerabilities. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting and incident management.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to the latest versions to reduce risk of exploitation.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
OÜ Keskkonnaprojekt
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OÜ Keskkonnaprojekt
Description
OÜ Keskkonnaprojekt is an Estonian company providing comprehensive design and consulting services in building and infrastructure projects, including environmental facilities, roads, electrical networks, heating, construction supervision, and funding applications. They serve public and private sector clients with a focus on integrated solutions from concept to technical execution.
Key services
Building design, Environmental facilities design, Roads and streets design, Electrical networks and communications, District heating design, Construction supervision, Funding applications and studies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, jQuery Migrate 1.4.1, Flexslider, Fancybox, Modernizr, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress, WPML (multilingual plugin)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, WP Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with emails, phones, and physical addresses
  4. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and scripts
  5. HTTPS is enabled with no visible security issues
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy present
  7. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking without visible cookie consent
  8. Business appears to be a small Estonian engineering and consulting firm focused on infrastructure and environmental projects
  9. Content is in Estonian with multilingual support (EN, RU, DE)
  10. No social media links detected in the provided HTML
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with multilingual support via WPML. It uses legacy jQuery 1.12.4 and related plugins like Flexslider and Fancybox for UI components. The site loads scripts asynchronously and includes Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in modernizing JavaScript libraries and improving accessibility. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. No advanced hosting or CDN details are evident from the HTML. Technical risks include reliance on outdated jQuery versions and lack of security headers, which could be mitigated by modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with keskkonnaprojekt.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review keskkonnaprojekt.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.