Skip to main content

Security report for kenjo.io

Kenjo · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kenjo is a technology company offering workforce management software tailored for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) with deskless teams. Their platform consolidates HR tasks such as shift planning, time tracking, and payroll preparation into a single solution, positioning them as a specialized SaaS provider in the HR tech space. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear messaging targeting SMEs managing deskless workers. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks like Next.js and React, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, and employs a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR standards. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, though explicit security headers and incident response information are absent. Overall, the site is well-structured, performant, and trustworthy, with no signs of blocking or WAF interference.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kenjo.io

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kenjo operates in the competitive HR technology sector, focusing on workforce management for SMEs with deskless teams—a niche with growing demand. Their business model is SaaS-based, generating revenue through subscriptions. The company integrates with major payment processors like Stripe, indicating a mature payment infrastructure. The presence of extensive analytics and marketing tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention. While direct contact information is not prominently displayed, the site maintains transparency through comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. The lack of visible certifications or security policies may be an area for future enhancement to boost customer confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from abuse. Cookie consent is actively managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could be addressed to harden security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and may impact trust for security-conscious clients. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with additional best practices and public disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Create and make accessible a security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security and general inquiries to improve transparency.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant security certifications to strengthen trust signals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kenjo
Description
All your HR tasks in one place: shift planning, time tracking, and payroll preparation — built for SMEs managing deskless teams.
Key services
shift planning, time tracking, payroll preparation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Dreamdata analytics, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, VWO, Dreamdata, Hotjar, HubSpot
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, VWO, Dreamdata, Hotjar, HubSpot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, HubSpot, Typeform
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  4. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable
  6. No security policy or incident response information publicly available
  7. Good SEO and metadata implementation
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

Kenjo's website is built on a modern React/Next.js stack, ensuring server-side rendering and good SEO performance. The site uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools, including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, VWO, Dreamdata, Hotjar, and HubSpot, indicating a sophisticated approach to user behavior analysis and marketing optimization. Cookiebot manages cookie consent, supporting GDPR compliance. The site loads multiple asynchronously loaded scripts and preloads key assets, contributing to moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design evident. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented with room for minor improvements in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kenjo.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kenjo.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.