Skip to main content

Security report for kendesign.de

KENDESIGN - Werbeagentur Inh. Fatih Kendirli · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KENDESIGN is a small German communication agency specializing in branding, graphic design, marketing, SEO, social media management, web design, development, and hosting services. The website serves as a basic landing page presenting the company's services, contact information, and social media presence. The business targets local and regional clients seeking comprehensive communication and design solutions. The market position is that of a small agency with a consistent brand image and clear contact details. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the SeedProd Coming Soon Pro plugin, with technologies including jQuery, Tailwind CSS, and FontAwesome. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Hosting is managed via DomainControl nameservers. The site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the website has a basic posture with HTTPS enabled but no advanced security policies or vulnerability disclosures. No forms or data collection fields are present, reducing attack surface. The absence of cookie consent and privacy policy details beyond a basic privacy page indicates partial GDPR compliance. No incident response or security contact information is provided. Overall, the website is functional and moderately professional but could benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance improvements, and richer content to improve trust and user experience.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of kendesign.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kendesign.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kendesign.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9
Employees
0
Customers
9
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for kendesign.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KENDESIGN operates as a small communication agency focusing on integrated branding and marketing services. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a broad range of services from graphic design to hosting, targeting small to medium businesses in Germany. The business model is service-based with direct client engagement. The company maintains an active social media presence to support marketing efforts. Growth indicators are limited due to minimal website content and lack of detailed business data. Partnerships include use of third-party tools like TeamViewer and a Kanban project board (kenban.de). The company appears to be owner-operated with no subsidiaries or parent company mentioned.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available, which limits transparency and preparedness. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms and limited privacy policy details suggest incomplete GDPR compliance. No forms or input fields reduce risk of injection attacks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small agency website but requires improvements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure statement to increase transparency and trust.
  4. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and data processing details.
  5. Improve website content quality and SEO to better represent the business and improve user engagement.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
KENDESIGN - Werbeagentur Inh. Fatih Kendirli
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KENDESIGN - Werbeagentur Inh. Fatih Kendirli
Description
Branding, Grafikdesign, Screen-/Printdesign Marketing, SEO, Social Media Management, Webdesign, Developement & Hosting
Key services
Branding, Grafikdesign, Screen-/Printdesign, Marketing, SEO, Social Media Management, Webdesign, Development, Hosting
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, FontAwesome, Tailwind CSS, SeedProd Coming Soon Pro plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small agency landing page with basic content and contact information.
  2. No forms detected on the page; no data collection fields present.
  3. No explicit cookie consent or tracking detected.
  4. Social media presence is linked and consistent with business branding.
  5. No advanced security headers or policies found.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information provided.
  7. Website uses WordPress with SeedProd plugin for coming soon/landing page.
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD) found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with the SeedProd Coming Soon Pro plugin, jQuery, Tailwind CSS, and FontAwesome for styling and UI elements. Hosting is managed via DomainControl nameservers. The site loads external CSS and JS resources from its own domain, indicating self-hosted assets. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. No advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries detected. Accessibility features are minimal. SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags are present but basic. No structured data (JSON-LD) is implemented. The site lacks forms and interactive elements, reducing complexity but also limiting user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kendesign.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kendesign.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.