Skip to main content

Security report for keltenland-bw.de

Keltenland BW · Other · Germany

High risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Network security.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Keltenland BW is a small cultural and educational website dedicated to exploring the history and culture of the Celts in Baden-Württemberg, Germany. The site provides informative content aimed at a general audience interested in regional history and Celtic heritage. The business model is informational, focusing on cultural education without evident commercial transactions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and several plugins for SEO, accessibility, and cookie management, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and includes structured data for enhanced SEO performance. Security-wise, the website uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks published privacy policies, terms of service, and security incident response information, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the site is accessible, trustworthy for its niche, but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security documentation to improve user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching keltenland-bw.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
48
Average
57
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention keltenland-bw.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for keltenland-bw.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets cultural enthusiasts and educational audiences interested in Celtic history within the Baden-Württemberg region. It occupies a niche market position as a regional cultural heritage informational platform. The site leverages SEO best practices and accessibility features to broaden reach and inclusivity. There is no evidence of commercial activities or partnerships. The business appears to be relatively new, founded around 2021, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The content quality and branding are consistent, supporting a professional image. Growth potential lies in expanding content offerings and improving compliance to attract institutional partnerships or educational collaborations.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is properly configured, and cookie consent is managed via a reputable plugin. However, the absence of a privacy policy, terms of service, security policy, and incident response details indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. No advanced security headers were detected, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. To enhance security maturity, the site should publish comprehensive privacy and security policies, implement additional security headers, and establish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and responsibilities.
  3. Implement and disclose a security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Keltenland BW
Description
Erforschen Sie die faszinierende Welt der Kelten in Baden-Württemberg: Entdecken Sie ihre Geschichte und die keltische Sprache.
Key services
Information about Celtic history in Baden-Württemberg, Educational content on Celtic culture and language
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada Theme, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Borlabs Cookie, Accessibly accessibility plugin, Timeline and History Slider plugin, Rocket Lazy Load Scripts
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Avada theme and several plugins for SEO, accessibility, and content presentation.
  2. Content is focused on Celtic history and culture in Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Borlabs Cookie plugin.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No advertising or analytics services detected beyond basic cookie consent.
  8. Good use of structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph metadata for SEO and social sharing.
  9. Accessibility features enabled via Accessibly plugin.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Avada theme, supported by plugins for SEO (Yoast), accessibility (Accessibly), and cookie management (Borlabs Cookie). The use of lazy loading scripts and preloading assets indicates attention to performance optimization. The site is mobile-friendly and includes structured data for SEO enhancement. However, no hosting provider information was identified, and performance is moderate, suggesting potential for further optimization. The technical stack is standard for small to medium informational websites, with no detected legacy or vulnerable components in the provided data. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with keltenland-bw.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review keltenland-bw.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.