Skip to main content

Security report for keittech.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website keittech.com currently serves a security CAPTCHA challenge page powered by BitNinja, designed to block automated or suspicious visitors. No business or product information is accessible on this page, indicating that the actual website content is not publicly available without passing the CAPTCHA. The domain is relatively new, registered in March 2023, and uses GoDaddy as the registrar with DNS servers hosted at areait.lv. The presence of outdated CMS references (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) in meta tags suggests legacy or placeholder content rather than an active modern site. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA v2, and Google Analytics for tracking. However, no advanced security headers are detected, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which are areas for improvement. The CAPTCHA challenge effectively blocks access, limiting the ability to analyze the full website content or business details. From a security perspective, the site employs BitNinja's security service to mitigate automated threats, which is a positive control. However, the lack of visible privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, or contact information reduces trust and compliance posture. The domain registration data is consistent but minimal, with no privacy protection and no registrant details disclosed. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible for normal browsing due to the security challenge, resulting in a low AI score and limited insights into business operations. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, updating CMS platforms, implementing comprehensive privacy and security policies, and providing clear business contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching keittech.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the CAPTCHA block, no direct business information or market positioning can be determined from the website content. The domain is newly registered and does not present any company name, description, or services. The meta tags reference Joomla and WordPress CMS platforms but do not provide business context. No contact emails, phone numbers, or addresses are available. The site appears to be protected by BitNinja security services, indicating a focus on security but no visible commercial presence or customer engagement features. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified.

Security posture

The website employs BitNinja's CAPTCHA challenge to prevent automated or malicious access, which is a strong security measure against bots. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and updated CMS versions indicates potential vulnerabilities. No privacy or security policies are published, and no incident response contacts are provided. The domain registration status includes protective locks, which is positive. Overall, the security posture is moderate due to the effective bot protection but weakened by outdated software references and lack of transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Upgrade CMS platforms to supported, secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  4. Add clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  5. Deploy standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve web security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. The website content is a security CAPTCHA challenge page served by BitNinja to block automated or suspicious visitors. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
This page is a security CAPTCHA challenge page designed to block automated or suspicious visitors. It does not provide business or product information.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Google Analytics, BitNinja security service
Frameworks
Joomla! 1.5, WordPress 2.5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA to prevent automated access
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently blocked by a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge.
  2. No business or product information is accessible on this page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or company details are provided.
  5. Use of outdated CMS versions indicated in meta tags may pose security risks.
  6. Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts are present, indicating tracking.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled for domain.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain registered recently with GoDaddy and protected by registrar locks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) as indicated by meta tags, which are outdated and potentially insecure. The front-end employs standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, including Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation and Google Analytics for tracking. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and uses DNS servers at areait.lv without DNSSEC enabled. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. The site is currently blocked by a BitNinja CAPTCHA challenge, limiting content access and analysis. There is no evidence of modern frameworks or platforms beyond the CMS references.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with keittech.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review keittech.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.