Skip to main content

Security report for kc-inks.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.kc-inks.co.uk currently does not host any live content and instead displays a Wix placeholder error page indicating the domain is not connected to a site. There is no business information, contact details, or policies available on the page. The domain WHOIS lookup failed due to domain naming rules violation, suggesting the domain is either invalid or misconfigured. The technical infrastructure is based on Wix platform technologies including React and Wix's FedOps logger, but no active website content or security configurations are present. The security posture is minimal with no security headers or SSL details available. Overall, the site is non-functional and does not provide any business or compliance information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kc-inks.co.uk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of any live website content or business information, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears inactive or improperly configured, with no evidence of operational business activities, market positioning, or customer engagement. There are no partnerships, certifications, or contact channels visible. The domain's status and WHOIS data further indicate lack of legitimacy or active use.

Security posture

The security posture is weak as the domain is not connected to a live site and no security headers or SSL configurations are evident. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy. There are no indications of privacy compliance, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosures. The site does not collect user data or have forms, reducing attack surface but also indicating no active business operations. The overall security maturity is very low.

Recommendations

  1. Connect the domain to a properly configured live website to enable security and compliance features.
  2. Ensure domain registration complies with naming rules and WHOIS data is complete and accurate.
  3. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and configure essential security headers.
  4. Publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with regulations.
  5. Add clear business contact information and incident response channels to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The website shows a Wix domain not connected error page with HTTP 404 server error code, indicating no live content is available. This is not a WAF challenge but a domain connection error. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
This domain is not connected to a live website; the page is a Wix placeholder error page indicating the domain is not connected to a site.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
React 18.2.0, Wix platform, FedOps Logger
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a Wix placeholder error page indicating domain is not connected
  2. No business or contact information present
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected
  5. No security headers or SSL information available
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected beyond Wix platform scripts
  7. No social media or external business links present
  8. WHOIS data unavailable and domain appears invalid
Technical notes

Notes

The site is hosted on Wix platform using React 18.2.0 and Wix's FedOps logger scripts. The page is a standard Wix error placeholder with minimal content and no SEO or accessibility optimizations. No analytics or advertising scripts are present beyond Wix platform defaults. The site lacks performance optimizations and mobile responsiveness is basic. The domain is not connected to a live site, resulting in no meaningful technical infrastructure beyond Wix's error page delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kc-inks.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kc-inks.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.