Skip to main content

Security report for kb-design.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website kbdesign.prod-cat.com is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) blocking page. This prevents any meaningful content or business information from being retrieved or analyzed. The domain appears to be a subdomain with no WHOIS registration data available, which raises concerns about its legitimacy and operational status. Without access to the actual website content, no privacy, cookie, or security policies can be evaluated, and no contact information or business details are available. From a technical perspective, the site is protected by Cloudflare, indicating some level of security infrastructure, but the blocking prevents assessment of SSL configuration, security headers, or technology stack beyond Cloudflare's presence. The lack of WHOIS data and the blocking page suggest the domain or subdomain may be inactive, unregistered, or protected by privacy measures that obscure ownership details. Security posture is currently poor due to the inability to verify any security best practices or compliance measures. The site does not provide any visible forms, scripts, or analytics tools, and no external business or social media links are present except for Cloudflare references. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility due to the blocking and lack of accessible data. Strategic recommendations include resolving the WAF blocking to allow legitimate user access, publishing clear privacy and cookie policies, providing verifiable contact and business information, and ensuring proper WHOIS registration data is available to improve trust and legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kb-design.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kb-design.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kb-design.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible content and WHOIS data, no concrete business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears to be a subdomain without independent registration, and no company name, services, or market positioning is evident. The presence of Cloudflare suggests some security awareness, but the lack of transparency and content limits any assessment of business model, target audience, or competitive advantages. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable from the data provided.

Security posture

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the Cloudflare WAF blocking access. While Cloudflare protection is a positive indicator, the inability to access the site prevents verification of SSL configuration, security headers, or vulnerability management. No incident response contacts or security policies are visible. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps. Overall, the site currently presents a high risk due to lack of transparency and accessibility.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve Cloudflare WAF blocking issues to allow legitimate user access and content visibility.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Provide clear contact information and business details on the website.
  4. Ensure WHOIS registration data is complete and publicly accessible to enhance legitimacy.
  5. Implement and verify security headers and SSL configuration to strengthen security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare security service with a challenge page indicating user is blocked from accessing the site. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is inaccessible due to Cloudflare WAF blocking the user
  2. No actual website content available for analysis
  3. No metadata, structured data, or business information present
  4. No contact information or policies found
  5. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected
  6. Only external link is to Cloudflare domain
  7. No security headers or SSL details available from provided data
  8. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable or non-existent
  9. Analysis incomplete due to WAF/security mechanisms. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides CDN and security services. No CMS or specific frameworks are detectable due to the blocking page. The HTML content is minimal and only serves a security challenge page. No analytics, advertising, or tracking scripts are present. Performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO cannot be evaluated. The technical implementation is currently limited to Cloudflare's security layer with no visible site infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kb-design.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kb-design.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.