Skip to main content

Security report for katechetiolomouc.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Katechetické centrum Olomouc' appears to be a small, local religious or catechetical center based in Olomouc, Czech Republic. The current website content is minimal and primarily serves as a redirect notice to a new website, indicating that this site is no longer actively maintained. The business model is likely non-commercial and community-focused, targeting local individuals interested in religious education. The site uses WordPress with the Kadence theme and some standard plugins, reflecting a moderate level of technical maturity. However, the lack of substantive content, contact information, and policies limits its professionalism and user engagement. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance features. The absence of WHOIS data is a significant concern, impacting the domain's trustworthiness and legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but minimal, with several areas for improvement in security, compliance, and content richness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching katechetiolomouc.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind the website seems to be a small religious or educational entity serving the Olomouc community. The minimal content and lack of contact or policy pages suggest limited digital engagement or a transition to a new platform (nacesteviry.cz). There are no visible revenue streams, certifications, or partnerships indicated on the site. The absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which could affect stakeholder trust. The site does not employ analytics or marketing tools, indicating a low level of digital marketing maturity. Strategic partnerships or related domains are not evident from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, which is essential. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that help mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No forms or user input fields are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations, which is a risk for user trust and legal compliance. The missing WHOIS data is a major red flag, suggesting possible issues with domain registration or privacy protection that is not justified. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information and incident response contacts to improve transparency and user support.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to enhance domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance website content and navigation to improve user experience, SEO, and engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to represent a religious or catechetical center in Olomouc, Czech Republic. The content is minimal and mainly informs visitors that the site is no longer active and invites them to visit a new website at nacesteviry.cz.
Content quality
poor
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Kadence Theme, Google Fonts, WP Emoji, Newsletter Plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and indicates the site is no longer active.
  2. No contact information or policies are present on the site.
  3. Site uses WordPress with Kadence theme and some standard plugins.
  4. No security headers detected in the HTML source.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No forms or data collection mechanisms found.
  7. No social media links or company emails found.
  8. WHOIS data is missing, which is a critical trust and legitimacy issue.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Kadence theme, which is a modern and flexible framework. It loads Google Fonts and uses standard WordPress emoji scripts. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design principles. Performance appears moderate with no heavy scripts or analytics detected. However, the site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and structured data beyond basic schema.org WebPage markup. No forms or interactive elements are present, limiting data collection capabilities. The absence of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with katechetiolomouc.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review katechetiolomouc.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.