Skip to main content

Security report for karlsjahr2014-ingelheim.de

Stadt Ingelheim am Rhein, Forschungsstelle Kaiserpfalz Ingelheim · Government · Germany

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website karlsjahr2014-ingelheim.de serves as an informational and promotional platform for the Karlsjahr 2014 cultural event in Ingelheim am Rhein, commemorating 1200 years since the death of Charlemagne. It is managed by local government and cultural institutions, providing detailed schedules, exhibition information, and visitor guidance. The site targets tourists, history enthusiasts, families, and educational groups. The business model focuses on cultural heritage promotion and education, positioning itself as a local government-supported event site.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching karlsjahr2014-ingelheim.de

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention karlsjahr2014-ingelheim.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for karlsjahr2014-ingelheim.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates within the government and non-profit cultural sector, emphasizing historical exhibitions and educational events. It leverages partnerships with local museums, educational centers, and cultural organizations. The detailed event calendar and workshops indicate active community engagement and a focus on heritage tourism. The business benefits from trust signals such as official contact information and consistent branding, though it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies which may affect compliance.

Security posture

The site uses HTTPS (implied) and Piwik analytics for user tracking but lacks visible security headers and modern JavaScript libraries, which may expose it to some vulnerabilities. No forms collecting sensitive data were found, reducing risk exposure. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by updating libraries, adding security headers, and implementing privacy compliance mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR.
  2. Upgrade JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Enforce HTTPS site-wide and ensure all resources load securely.
  5. Consider publishing a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stadt Ingelheim am Rhein, Forschungsstelle Kaiserpfalz Ingelheim
Description
The website promotes the Karlsjahr 2014 event in Ingelheim am Rhein, commemorating 1200 years since the death of Charlemagne with exhibitions, events, and a historical route.
Key services
Exhibitions, Historical tours and routes, Educational workshops and lectures, Event scheduling and visitor information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery 1.8, Google Fonts, Piwik Analytics (Matomo), Stacks4Stacks plugins
Frameworks
HV-Tabs theme, Archetypon Collapsible, Doobox Trunky Stack
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by URLs (http:// and https:// mixed, but no explicit SSL check)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik (Matomo)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik (Matomo)
Marketing tools
Piwik Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is dedicated to a cultural event commemorating Charlemagne in Ingelheim am Rhein in 2014.
  2. Content is rich with detailed event schedules, exhibition information, and visitor guidance.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  4. No forms collecting personal data detected in the HTML content.
  5. Use of Piwik (Matomo) analytics indicates some user tracking but no explicit cookie consent.
  6. Website uses older jQuery version (1.8) which may have security concerns.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  8. Contact information is clearly provided with official emails and phone numbers.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  10. Mobile optimization and responsive design are implemented via HV-Tabs and responsive CSS.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Stacks framework (likely RapidWeaver) with HV-Tabs theme and various JavaScript plugins. It uses Google Fonts and Piwik (Matomo) for analytics. Hosting is via webgo.de as indicated by nameservers. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured content. Performance is moderate, with some outdated libraries that could be modernized. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and semantic HTML. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but requires updates for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with karlsjahr2014-ingelheim.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review karlsjahr2014-ingelheim.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.