Skip to main content

Security report for karlogroup.lv

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

42/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed content corresponds to a Chrome internal error page (chrome-error://chromewebdata/) that appears when a website is not accessible or offline. It contains embedded scripts for the Chrome offline dinosaur game and no actual website content, business information, or metadata. Consequently, there is no identifiable company, no privacy or cookie policies, no contact information, and no security policies. The page is not a real website but a browser-generated error page, limiting the scope of meaningful analysis. The technical infrastructure is minimal and specific to the Chrome browser environment, with no external hosting or CMS detected. Security posture is minimal due to the nature of the page, and no vulnerabilities or security best practices apply. Overall, this is a non-business page serving as an offline error placeholder with embedded game functionality.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      DNS Resolution Failed

      Unable to resolve domain A records

      What to do: Verify domain is properly configured and not expired

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching karlogroup.lv

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
60
DNS health
25
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
42

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No business intelligence can be derived from this content as it is not a commercial or organizational website. There is no company name, market positioning, services, or target audience information. The page serves purely as a browser error and offline game interface.

Security posture

The security posture is not applicable in the traditional sense since this is a browser internal error page. No HTTPS or security headers are relevant here. No sensitive data or forms are present, and no external scripts or analytics are loaded. The page is inherently safe as it is local to the browser environment.

Recommendations

  1. Ensure that actual website content is accessible to users and not blocked by browser errors.
  2. Implement proper hosting and domain configuration to avoid browser error pages.
  3. Provide clear privacy and cookie policies on the real website.
  4. Include contact and security incident response information on the live site.
  5. Use HTTPS and security headers on the actual website to improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

None detected. Content is a Chrome internal error page (chrome-error://chromewebdata/) indicating no external website content is accessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, Canvas API
Frameworks
Chromium internal scripts
Platforms
Chrome browser
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. The content is a Chrome internal error page with embedded offline dinosaur game scripts.
  2. No real website content or business information is present.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or security policies are provided.
  5. No external links, emails, or social media links detected.
  6. No SEO or structured data metadata present.
  7. No advertising or analytics scripts detected.
  8. The page is not a real website but a browser error page, so most analyses are not applicable.
Technical notes

Notes

The page uses standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies embedded within the Chrome browser environment. It includes scripts for the offline dinosaur game using Canvas API and event handling. No external libraries, CMS, or hosting providers are detected. The page is optimized for mobile and desktop with responsive design and accessibility features for the game. Performance is fast due to minimal content and local execution. SEO and metadata are absent as this is not a public website page.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with karlogroup.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review karlogroup.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.