Skip to main content

Security report for kapelica.org

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Galerija Kapelica is a small, niche art gallery website primarily focused on presenting cultural and artistic exhibitions through an interactive Adobe Flash experience. The website's market position is local and specialized, targeting general audiences interested in art and culture. The business model appears non-commercial or cultural with no visible e-commerce or transactional services. Technically, the site relies on outdated Flash technology, which severely limits accessibility and performance on modern devices. The site lacks mobile optimization, accessibility features, and modern SEO practices. Security posture is weak, with no HTTPS enforcement, no security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies despite using Google Analytics for tracking. The domain is old and registered with a reputable registrar, indicating legitimacy, but the technical and security aspects require significant modernization. Overall, the site presents a low trustworthiness profile and poor user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kapelica.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as a digital presence for an art gallery, likely operating in a cultural or non-profit capacity. Its competitive advantage is niche specialization in art exhibitions, but it lacks modern digital marketing and user engagement features. Revenue streams are unclear, with no e-commerce or donation mechanisms visible. The target customer segment is general art enthusiasts and local visitors. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators are limited due to minimal content and outdated technology. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the site content or linked domains.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low. The use of deprecated Adobe Flash technology introduces significant security risks and compatibility issues. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers exposes users to potential man-in-the-middle attacks and other web-based threats. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible. The site uses Google Analytics without a consent mechanism, which may violate privacy laws. Overall, the security posture requires urgent improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Migrate the website from Adobe Flash to modern web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript frameworks to improve accessibility and security.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR requirements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve website accessibility and mobile responsiveness to enhance user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Galerija Kapelica is an art gallery website featuring a Flash-based interactive experience. The site appears to be focused on art exhibitions or cultural events.
Key services
art exhibitions, cultural presentations
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Adobe Flash, JavaScript, Google Analytics
Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website relies on deprecated Adobe Flash technology, which is unsupported by modern browsers.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact information such as emails or phone numbers found on the page.
  4. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  5. Minimal textual content and poor SEO and accessibility practices.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in the HTML content.
  7. Domain is old and appears legitimate but technical and security posture is weak.
  8. Site footer states 'Stran NE uporablja cookijev' (The site does NOT use cookies), which conflicts with Google Analytics usage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is outdated, relying heavily on Adobe Flash, which is no longer supported by modern browsers, resulting in poor performance and accessibility. The tech stack includes basic JavaScript and Google Analytics for tracking but lacks modern frameworks or CMS platforms. Hosting details are limited to the registrar information, with no clear hosting provider identified. Performance is slow due to Flash content and lack of optimization. The site lacks meta tags, structured data, and accessibility features, indicating technical debt and modernization opportunities. Security risks stem from missing HTTPS enforcement and security headers. Overall, the technical implementation is weak and requires a full modernization effort.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kapelica.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kapelica.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.