Skip to main content

Security report for kapaok.lv

OK Kāpa · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OK Kāpa is a Latvian orienteering club focused on organizing orienteering competitions, training sessions, and community sports activities. The website serves as an informational hub for event announcements, results, maps, and news primarily targeting local orienteering enthusiasts and athletes. The club maintains a presence through multiple subdomains dedicated to past events and uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site content is mostly static and text-heavy, with limited interactive features or modern web design elements. Technical infrastructure is basic, relying on traditional HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage implied but lacks visible security headers and modern charset encoding. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the website reflects a small, community-focused sports organization with room for technical and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kapaok.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The club operates as a non-profit entity in the sports sector, specifically orienteering, serving a niche local market in Latvia. Its business model revolves around event organization, training, and community engagement rather than commercial revenue streams. The website links to multiple related domains for event-specific information, indicating a decentralized digital presence. The target audience includes local athletes, families, and orienteering enthusiasts. The club demonstrates consistent event activity and community involvement but lacks formal business certifications or advanced digital marketing strategies. Partnership with official orienteering organizations and local sponsors is evident through external links. Growth indicators are limited to event announcements and community projects. The business ecosystem is primarily regional with no evident commercial subsidiaries or parent companies.

Security posture

The website exhibits a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security. The charset is set to windows-1257, which is outdated and may pose compatibility and security risks. No forms collecting sensitive data are present, reducing attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. Google Analytics is used without visible cookie consent, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or security policy information is published. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files suggests limited security maturity. Recommendations include implementing security headers, upgrading charset to UTF-8, enforcing HTTPS with HSTS, and adding privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Upgrade website charset to UTF-8 for better compatibility and security.
  4. Introduce cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Enhance website design and mobile responsiveness to improve user experience and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OK Kāpa
Description
OK Kāpa is an orienteering club organizing orienteering competitions, training, and related activities primarily in Latvia. The site provides information about events, results, maps, projects, and news related to orienteering sports.
Key services
Orienteering competitions, Training and coaching, Event organization, Map and route provision, Community sports activities
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://kapaok.lv)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an informational portal for a local orienteering club in Latvia.
  2. Content is mostly static with event announcements and results.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  4. No contact forms detected; contact info is limited to email and phone in text.
  5. Site uses outdated charset windows-1257 instead of UTF-8.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security mechanisms in HTML.
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent.
  8. Navigation is text-heavy with many links to subdomains for past events.
  9. No social media links explicitly labeled, but Facebook album links present.
  10. No evident business certifications or security policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with no modern frameworks or CMS detected. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The charset is windows-1257, which is outdated and should be updated to UTF-8. The site lacks meta tags for SEO beyond basic content-type and title. No accessibility features or ARIA roles are present. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern web standards and responsive design. Hosting provider and server details are not visible in the HTML content. The site structure is table-based and dated, indicating technical debt and opportunity for modernization. No forms or dynamic content detected, limiting data collection but also user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kapaok.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kapaok.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.