Skip to main content

Security report for kapa.lv

Kāpa · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kāpa is a Latvian orienteering club focused on organizing orienteering and adventure sports events such as the Kāpas Saulkrastu Pavasaris series and rogaining competitions. The website serves as a hub for event information, results, and community engagement, targeting orienteering enthusiasts primarily in Latvia. The site is built on WordPress using the Overlay theme and several plugins including Ghostkit and SimpleLightbox, with Google Tag Manager integrated for analytics. The technical infrastructure is modern and mobile-optimized, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is legitimate and consistent with a small sports club's online presence, but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kapa.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
82
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The club operates in the niche sports and recreation sector, focusing on orienteering events in Latvia. It maintains partnerships with local organizations and sponsors, as evidenced by multiple linked domains and sponsor logos. The business model appears community and event-driven without commercial sales directly on the site. The target audience includes local athletes and sports enthusiasts. The club leverages digital tools like WordPress and Google Tag Manager to manage content and track engagement. Growth indicators include active event scheduling and social media presence. The partnership ecosystem includes event-specific subdomains and related sports organizations, enhancing credibility and reach.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Forms and inputs are minimal and do not appear to collect sensitive data, reducing risk. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate tracking but no explicit cookie consent mechanism is found, which may raise GDPR compliance concerns. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened by implementing security headers, formal policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Create a security.txt file to provide vulnerability disclosure information and improve security transparency.
  4. Include incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize user tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kāpa
Description
Kāpa is an orienteering club organizing orienteering events and competitions primarily in Latvia, including series like Kāpas Saulkrastu Pavasaris, Ziemeļu Divdienas, and other adventure and rogaining competitions.
Key services
Orienteering competitions, Adventure and rogaining events, Community sports engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Ghostkit plugin, SimpleLightbox, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Overlay WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google Tag Manager asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based orienteering club site with event information and results
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact information is limited to email and social media links without phone or physical address
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
  5. Uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML content
  7. Good mobile responsiveness and navigation clarity
  8. Multiple external partner and sponsor domains linked
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with the Overlay theme and a child theme customized for the club. It uses jQuery, Ghostkit plugin for Gutenberg blocks and carousels, and SimpleLightbox for image galleries. Google Tag Manager is integrated asynchronously for analytics. The site loads CSS and JS resources from both the site domain and trusted external sources like Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive CSS for tablets and mobiles. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. Accessibility is basic with skip links and alt attributes on images but could be improved. SEO is basic with meta viewport and title tags but lacks structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. No signs of technical debt or deprecated libraries were found.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kapa.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kapa.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.