Kanzlei Dr. Peter Unmüßig is a small, regionally established German law firm specializing in traffic law, labor law, inheritance law, tenancy law, administrative offenses, insurance law, and civil law. The firm operates from a main office in Gundelfingen with multiple branch offices, and is a member of the Apraxa cooperative network of law firms. The website provides comprehensive legal service information, attorney biographies, and detailed privacy and legal disclaimers, targeting private clients and businesses seeking legal representation. Technically, the website uses legacy jQuery and standard HTML/CSS with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with no HTTPS or security headers explicitly confirmed, and an outdated jQuery version poses a potential risk. Privacy compliance is strong with a detailed GDPR-compliant privacy policy, though no cookie consent mechanism is present. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from technical and security updates.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
45
Average
60
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention kanzlei-unmuessig.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for kanzlei-unmuessig.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The firm holds a solid market position in its regional legal services sector, leveraging membership in a large cooperative network to extend its reach. Its business model focuses on personalized legal consultation and representation, with key revenue streams from client services in various legal domains. The target audience includes individuals and companies with legal needs in traffic, labor, inheritance, and insurance law. The website content and structure support client engagement and trust-building, though the absence of social media and modern marketing tools suggests a traditional approach. The firm’s multiple branch offices indicate moderate size and regional coverage. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. While it uses no cookies and has a comprehensive privacy policy, it lacks modern security headers and uses an outdated jQuery version, which could expose it to known vulnerabilities. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, and no security.txt file is present. The absence of HTTPS enforcement details is a concern, though the domain uses reputable name servers. Data protection practices are well documented in the privacy policy, but technical security controls could be improved to reduce risk and enhance compliance.
Recommendations
Upgrade jQuery and all JavaScript libraries to current supported versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Implement and enforce HTTPS with proper SSL/TLS configuration and HSTS headers.
Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Introduce a cookie consent mechanism if cookies or tracking are implemented in the future.
Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Kanzlei Dr. Peter Unmüßig
Description
Rechtsanwaltskanzlei mit Hauptsitz in Gundelfingen und mehreren Zweigstellen, spezialisiert auf Verkehrsrecht, Arbeitsrecht, Erbrecht, Mietrecht, Ordnungswidrigkeitenrecht, Versicherungsrecht und Zivilrecht. Mitglied bei Apraxa e.G., einem genossenschaftlichen Verbund von Rechtsanwaltskanzleien.
Key services
Verkehrsrecht, Arbeitsrecht, Erbrecht, Miet- und WEG-Recht, Ordnungswidrigkeitenrecht, Versicherungsrecht, Zivilrecht
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
jQuery 1.7.1, CSS Grid, HTML5, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
No cookies used
No forms with sensitive inputs detected
Privacy policy with data protection details
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is a professional legal services site in German language.
No cookies or tracking scripts detected.
Privacy policy is detailed and GDPR compliant.
No forms with personal data collection visible on the main page.
Use of outdated jQuery version is a security concern.
No social media links detected.
Multiple physical office locations with contact details provided.
No terms of service page explicitly found.
No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
No incident response or abuse contact information found.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built with standard HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, relying on an outdated jQuery 1.7.1 library. It uses CSS Grid for layout and includes multiple custom JavaScript files for UI interactions. Hosting is via DomainControl (GoDaddy), as indicated by the name servers. The site has moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There is no detected CMS or modern framework. The site could benefit from modernization to improve maintainability, security, and user experience.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with kanzlei-unmuessig.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kanzlei-unmuessig.de.