Skip to main content

Security report for kanzlei-unmuessig.de

Kanzlei Dr. Peter Unmüßig · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kanzlei Dr. Peter Unmüßig is a small, regionally established German law firm specializing in traffic law, labor law, inheritance law, tenancy law, administrative offenses, insurance law, and civil law. The firm operates from a main office in Gundelfingen with multiple branch offices, and is a member of the Apraxa cooperative network of law firms. The website provides comprehensive legal service information, attorney biographies, and detailed privacy and legal disclaimers, targeting private clients and businesses seeking legal representation. Technically, the website uses legacy jQuery and standard HTML/CSS with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with no HTTPS or security headers explicitly confirmed, and an outdated jQuery version poses a potential risk. Privacy compliance is strong with a detailed GDPR-compliant privacy policy, though no cookie consent mechanism is present. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from technical and security updates.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kanzlei-unmuessig.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
45
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kanzlei-unmuessig.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kanzlei-unmuessig.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm holds a solid market position in its regional legal services sector, leveraging membership in a large cooperative network to extend its reach. Its business model focuses on personalized legal consultation and representation, with key revenue streams from client services in various legal domains. The target audience includes individuals and companies with legal needs in traffic, labor, inheritance, and insurance law. The website content and structure support client engagement and trust-building, though the absence of social media and modern marketing tools suggests a traditional approach. The firm’s multiple branch offices indicate moderate size and regional coverage. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. While it uses no cookies and has a comprehensive privacy policy, it lacks modern security headers and uses an outdated jQuery version, which could expose it to known vulnerabilities. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, and no security.txt file is present. The absence of HTTPS enforcement details is a concern, though the domain uses reputable name servers. Data protection practices are well documented in the privacy policy, but technical security controls could be improved to reduce risk and enhance compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade jQuery and all JavaScript libraries to current supported versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and enforce HTTPS with proper SSL/TLS configuration and HSTS headers.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism if cookies or tracking are implemented in the future.
  5. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kanzlei Dr. Peter Unmüßig
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kanzlei Dr. Peter Unmüßig
Description
Rechtsanwaltskanzlei mit Hauptsitz in Gundelfingen und mehreren Zweigstellen, spezialisiert auf Verkehrsrecht, Arbeitsrecht, Erbrecht, Mietrecht, Ordnungswidrigkeitenrecht, Versicherungsrecht und Zivilrecht. Mitglied bei Apraxa e.G., einem genossenschaftlichen Verbund von Rechtsanwaltskanzleien.
Key services
Verkehrsrecht, Arbeitsrecht, Erbrecht, Miet- und WEG-Recht, Ordnungswidrigkeitenrecht, Versicherungsrecht, Zivilrecht
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7.1, CSS Grid, HTML5, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No cookies used
  • No forms with sensitive inputs detected
  • Privacy policy with data protection details

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional legal services site in German language.
  2. No cookies or tracking scripts detected.
  3. Privacy policy is detailed and GDPR compliant.
  4. No forms with personal data collection visible on the main page.
  5. Use of outdated jQuery version is a security concern.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. Multiple physical office locations with contact details provided.
  8. No terms of service page explicitly found.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  10. No incident response or abuse contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, relying on an outdated jQuery 1.7.1 library. It uses CSS Grid for layout and includes multiple custom JavaScript files for UI interactions. Hosting is via DomainControl (GoDaddy), as indicated by the name servers. The site has moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There is no detected CMS or modern framework. The site could benefit from modernization to improve maintainability, security, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kanzlei-unmuessig.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kanzlei-unmuessig.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.