Skip to main content

Security report for kaltura.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at kaltura.com is currently inaccessible due to an active AWS WAF security challenge combined with CloudFront error caching. This prevents retrieval of meaningful content, metadata, or business information from the site. The domain is mature, registered since 2006 with Amazon Registrar, Inc., and uses enterprise-grade DNS and CDN infrastructure. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is critically lacking, with no valid certificate or HTTPS support detected, exposing the site to security risks and trust issues. The lack of accessible content also means no privacy, cookie, or terms policies can be verified, nor any contact or social media information. Overall, the site’s security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and the blocking WAF challenge, which also severely limits content and technical analysis.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of kaltura.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kaltura.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Based on domain registration and DNS data, kaltura.com is an established technology sector entity with a mature domain and strong domain protection statuses. The use of Akamai name servers and AWS CloudFront hosting indicates a focus on performance and security at the infrastructure level. However, the inability to access site content limits insights into business model, market positioning, or services. No external partner or subsidiary domains were identified from the provided data. The domain’s registration consistency and longevity support legitimacy, but the lack of visible business information and contact details reduces transparency.

Security posture

The security posture is currently poor due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which is a critical issue. The presence of AWS WAF indicates an attempt to protect the site, but the active challenge page blocks legitimate access and analysis. Security headers like X-XSS-Protection and Referrer-Policy are present, but important protections such as HSTS, OCSP stapling, and modern TLS protocols are missing. No vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, but the overall configuration is insufficient for a secure production website. Incident response and security policy information are not available, indicating gaps in transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and improve trust.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable legacy protocols.
  3. Implement HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS usage.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  5. Review AWS WAF challenge settings to reduce user friction and allow legitimate access.
  6. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies accessible to users.
  7. Provide visible contact information and security incident response contacts.
  8. Correct malformed CAA DNS records to ensure proper certificate authority restrictions.
  9. Improve website content accessibility and SEO metadata for better user experience.
  10. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to maintain security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on AWS CloudFront with AWS WAF providing security filtering. DNS is managed via Akamai name servers, indicating a robust CDN and DNS infrastructure. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is non-functional with no valid certificate and no TLS protocols enabled, resulting in no HTTPS support. The site currently serves a minimal HTML page with a JavaScript-based WAF challenge, blocking content access. No CMS or frameworks are detectable from the limited HTML. Performance data is unavailable due to blocked content. The site lacks SEO metadata and accessibility features. The technical debt includes missing SSL, incomplete DNS CAA records, and reliance on a blocking WAF challenge that impairs usability and analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
  3. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kaltura.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kaltura.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.