Skip to main content

Security report for kainoteka.lt

E-commerce · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kainoteka.lt is a Lithuanian price comparison portal offering consumers the ability to compare prices across over 400 stores and more than 6 million products. The website targets Lithuanian consumers seeking the best deals and operates as an aggregator of product offers, positioning itself as a significant player in the local e-commerce ecosystem. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS, with analytics implemented via Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and search capabilities. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks visible security headers and published privacy or security policies, which are areas for improvement. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust assessment. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kainoteka.lt

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kainoteka.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kainoteka.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the e-commerce sector as a price comparison service, aggregating offers from a large number of Lithuanian retailers. Its competitive advantage lies in the extensive product catalog and user-friendly interface. Revenue is likely generated via affiliate commissions or advertising. The target audience is Lithuanian consumers looking for convenient price comparisons. The site shows moderate digital maturity with modern frontend frameworks and analytics integration. However, the absence of clear business contact information and privacy policies may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent banner indicating some privacy awareness. However, the lack of HTTP security headers, absence of published privacy and security policies, and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicate gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS transparency further limits trust. To improve, the organization should implement security headers, publish comprehensive privacy and security policies, provide contact channels for security incidents, and consider a security.txt file for vulnerability reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage or footer.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incidents.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Kainų palyginimo portalas ☑️ 6 000 000 skirtingų prekių ☑️ >400 parduotuvių. Patogiai ir greitai ➞ suraskite pigiausią iš pasiūlymų!
Key services
Price comparison, Product search, Store offers aggregation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, CookieYes, Nuxt.js, Tailwind CSS, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics via GTM
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Lithuanian price comparison portal with a large product catalog
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage
  4. Cookie consent banner present indicating some privacy compliance
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML
  6. Uses modern frontend technologies (Nuxt.js, Tailwind CSS)
  7. Includes Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  10. No visible certifications or trust badges
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Nuxt.js (Vue.js framework) and Tailwind CSS for styling, indicating a contemporary frontend architecture. Analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity, supporting user behavior analysis. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified. The site lacks some security best practices such as HTTP security headers and detailed privacy documentation, which are important for compliance and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kainoteka.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kainoteka.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.