Skip to main content

Security report for kaibaterrace.com

Other · Japan

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.kaibaterrace.com is a Japanese language platform focused on facial esthetic salons and clinics in Tsukuba, Japan. It provides detailed content about various facial treatments and the local environment, targeting individuals interested in beauty and wellness services. The site appears to be a small-scale content and recommendation platform, likely monetized through affiliate links or advertising. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, without advanced frameworks or CMS detected. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO but lacks accessibility features and modern performance enhancements. Security posture is weak, with no HTTPS or security headers detected, no privacy or cookie policies, and no contact or incident response information. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site has moderate content quality but poor security and privacy compliance, resulting in a low overall risk score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kaibaterrace.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kaibaterrace.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kaibaterrace.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the niche beauty and wellness sector, focusing on facial esthetic services in the Tsukuba region of Japan. It targets local consumers and commuters seeking skin care and relaxation treatments. The business model appears to be content-driven with potential affiliate marketing or advertising revenue streams. The site links to multiple external domains, some of which may be affiliate or advertising partners, but no clear business partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The lack of company contact information and certifications limits trust and professional credibility. Growth potential depends on improving transparency, security, and compliance to build user trust and expand audience reach.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low. The absence of HTTPS/SSL is a critical vulnerability that exposes users to data interception risks. No security headers are implemented to protect against common web attacks. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, reducing readiness for security events. The missing WHOIS registration data further undermines trust and raises suspicion about domain legitimacy. Overall, the site requires urgent improvements in encryption, policy transparency, and security best practices to protect users and comply with regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Publish clear contact information including support and security incident contacts.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides detailed information and recommendations about facial esthetic salons and clinics in Tsukuba, Japan. It highlights various facial esthetic treatments such as cleansing, peeling, hydrafacial, photo facial, radio frequency, and massage, emphasizing skin care benefits and relaxation. It also describes the attractiveness of Tsukuba city as a balanced urban and natural environment with convenient access to Tokyo and local charm.
Key services
Facial esthetic treatment information, Salon and clinic recommendations, Beauty and skin care advice
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are provided.
  4. No security policies or incident response information is available.
  5. No certifications or compliance indicators are present.
  6. Website uses a Japanese character set (Shift_JIS) and targets Japanese audience.
  7. External links mostly point to unrelated domains, possibly affiliate or advertising links.
  8. Tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro are present, indicating user behavior tracking.
  9. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected; site appears static or custom built.
  10. No HTTPS or SSL information available from provided data; security headers not detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic web technologies including HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without any detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The character encoding is Shift_JIS, targeting Japanese users. The site includes external JavaScript for tracking via Research Artisan Pro. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present but limited accessibility features. No hosting provider or CDN information is available from the data. The site structure is simple with clear navigation but lacks modern responsive design elements. Technical debt appears low but modernization and security hardening are needed to improve user experience and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kaibaterrace.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kaibaterrace.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.