Skip to main content

Security report for kabukasmorphs.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kabuka's Morphs is a niche adult content website specializing in breast expansion morphs and deepfake nude celebrity photos. The site operates on a subscription model where supporters gain access to exclusive content via a monthly password distributed on platforms like SubscribeStar, Patreon, and Ko-Fi. The website uses WordPress CMS and integrates common plugins for polls, social sharing, and user interaction. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare DNS and standard web technologies such as jQuery and Vue.js. While HTTPS is enabled and domain registration is stable, the site lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, which are recommended for enhanced security. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no explicit cookie consent mechanisms or comprehensive privacy policies. Contact information and incident response channels are not provided, limiting transparency and trust. Overall, the site is functional and serves a specific adult audience but would benefit from improved security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kabukasmorphs.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets adult consumers interested in erotic morph and deepfake content, leveraging a supporter-based revenue model through monthly password access. It maintains a consistent brand presence with active social media channels and partnerships with popular subscription platforms. The business operates in a niche market with limited direct competition, focusing on unique content types. Advertising partnerships include adult affiliate programs and native ads, contributing to revenue diversification. The lack of direct contact information and limited compliance documentation may impact business credibility and user trust. Growth potential exists through enhanced privacy compliance and security improvements, which could broaden audience confidence and retention.

Security posture

The current security posture shows basic maturity with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security exposes the site to potential DNS spoofing and clickjacking risks. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, which could delay mitigation of security incidents. The site does not provide privacy or cookie consent mechanisms, posing compliance risks under GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, the security framework requires strengthening to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms.
  4. Provide clear contact information for business inquiries and security incident reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website providing breast expansion and adult model morphs, featuring fake nude celebrity photos and erotic unrealistic edits. Content is deepfake and not intended to represent reality.
Key services
Adult morph image posts, Exclusive supporter content access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Vue.js, FontAwesome, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
WP Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
TrafficHunt, MagnetSrv
Tracking pixels
WP Statistics
Marketing tools
AddToAny social sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche adult content site specializing in morph and deepfake images
  2. Content is gated behind monthly password for supporters
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, only DMCA and 18 U.S.C. compliance statements
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for polls, likes/dislikes, and social sharing
  6. Social media presence on DeviantArt, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, Discord, and others
  7. Advertising includes adult affiliate programs and native ads
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  9. Security headers and DNSSEC are missing, representing improvement opportunities
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a modern theme (Hueman) and uses JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Vue.js for interactive features. It leverages Cloudflare for DNS services but does not enable DNSSEC. Performance is moderate with some optimizations like smart image loading and font preloading. Mobile optimization is good, and the site includes basic accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags and RSS feeds but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD. The site uses multiple third-party scripts for polls, social sharing, and analytics (WP Statistics). Advertising is integrated via native ads and affiliate links. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kabukasmorphs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kabukasmorphs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.