Skip to main content

Security report for jw-webdev.info

JW Web Development · Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JW Web Development is a small, established Polish technology company specializing in responsive website design, custom web applications, CMS/CRM solutions, e-commerce platforms, and graphic design services. With over 18 years of experience and more than 800 projects completed, the company serves primarily Polish businesses and institutions, with some international clients. Their market position is that of a trusted regional web development provider with a comprehensive service portfolio including digital accessibility and SEO. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including HTML5, CSS3, PHP, MySQL, jQuery, Bootstrap, and Angular, with a focus on responsive design and accessibility. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates areas for improvement. The lack of WHOIS transparency due to TLD restrictions limits domain trust verification but the professional website content and business information mitigate concerns. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with solid technical foundations. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and WHOIS transparency would enhance trust and compliance further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jw-webdev.info

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JW Web Development operates in the competitive web development and digital services market in Poland, targeting SMEs, institutions, and international clients. Their competitive advantage lies in long-term experience, a broad service offering including custom software and accessibility compliance, and a strong local presence. Revenue streams likely include project-based web development, ongoing maintenance, and digital marketing services. The company demonstrates growth potential through EU-funded project implementations and a diverse client base. Partnerships include social media presence on Facebook and use of Google marketing tools. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing privacy compliance and security transparency to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate to good. HTTPS is properly implemented, and no sensitive data leaks or vulnerable libraries are evident. However, missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and cookie consent mechanisms represent compliance gaps, especially under GDPR. Incident response and security policy information are absent, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. Data protection practices appear basic with a comprehensive privacy policy but lack of explicit cookie consent. The security culture could be improved by publishing incident contacts and adopting security best practices. Overall, the risk is moderate with recommendations to enhance headers and privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve security posture and trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update them accordingly.
  5. Consider WHOIS privacy transparency improvements or alternative verification methods to enhance domain trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
JW Web Development
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JW Web Development
Description
Projektowanie i tworzenie responsywnych stron internetowych, aplikacje CMS, CRM, Wordpress, portale, sklepy internetowe, programowanie PHP, bazy danych. Identyfikacja wizualna firm, grafika, reklama. Toruń Bydgoszcz
Key services
Responsive website design and development, Custom web applications and CMS/CRM solutions, E-commerce and B2B platforms, Graphic design and branding, SEO and social media management, WCAG digital accessibility audits and implementations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, jQuery, Bootstrap, MySQL, PHP, Angular, RWD (Responsive Web Design)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD restrictions, limiting domain trust verification.
  4. Privacy policy and legal notices are present and comprehensive.
  5. No cookie consent banner detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and responsive design is evident.
  8. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking with moderate user tracking level.
  9. No visible security headers detected; recommend adding for improved security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a solid and modern technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, PHP, MySQL, jQuery, Bootstrap, and Angular. It is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate but could benefit from optimization. The site uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, indicating a mature digital marketing setup. There is no evidence of a CMS other than custom CMS and Wordpress implementations. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of cookie consent, which could impact compliance and security. Modernization opportunities include enhancing security controls and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jw-webdev.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jw-webdev.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.