Skip to main content

Security report for justsingles.com

Just Singles · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Just Singles is an online dating platform targeting adults aged 30 to 60 seeking meaningful and lasting relationships. The site offers free membership and access to a shared mainstream dating network to increase match opportunities. The platform is built on WordPress with SEO optimization and uses multiple third-party analytics and advertising scripts. While the site is professionally designed and mobile-optimized, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as clear contact information, which impacts user trust and compliance. The domain WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about registration legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing key security headers. Overall, the site provides a functional dating service but requires improvements in transparency, security, and compliance to enhance trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching justsingles.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the online dating sector, focusing on mature singles. Its competitive advantage lies in access to a shared dating network and a user-friendly platform. Revenue likely derives from advertising and premium memberships. The target market is adults aged 30-60 seeking serious relationships. Partnerships with Online Dating Protector and wellness affiliate sites suggest a broader ecosystem approach. The lack of detailed company information and domain registration transparency may hinder growth and user confidence. Strategic focus on compliance and security enhancements could improve market position.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, which is a strong security baseline. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No privacy policy or cookie consent mechanisms are present, indicating GDPR compliance gaps. The use of multiple third-party ad and tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No incident response or security contact information is provided. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires significant improvements in headers, privacy compliance, and transparency to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve trust and readiness.
  5. Audit and limit third-party scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve site performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Just Singles
Description
JustSingles helps users aged 30 to 60 searching for singles interested in lasting relationships. Sign up today to find your perfect match
Key services
Online dating matchmaking, Profile browsing and searching, Access to a shared mainstream dating network
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Plausible Analytics, Ad scripts from aso1.net
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Online Dating Protector badge

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (gtag.js), Gauges, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
aso1.net
Tracking pixels
Gauges, Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. Content is focused on online dating for mature singles aged 30-60.
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages detected.
  4. No explicit company contact emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Multiple ad scripts and popunder ads detected, including from less reputable domains.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  7. Good SEO and technical implementation with WordPress and Yoast SEO.
  8. Security headers are missing or not detected in provided data.
  9. Site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  10. Content is safe but categorized as questionable due to dating nature targeting mature adults.
Technical notes

Notes

The site is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, and multiple analytics tools including Google Analytics, Gauges, and Plausible. It uses custom fonts and responsive design techniques for mobile optimization. Advertising is served via aso1.net with multiple ad formats including popunders and sticky ads. Performance is moderate with some potential overhead from multiple ad scripts. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. SEO is good with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features, representing technical debt and modernization opportunities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with justsingles.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review justsingles.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.