Skip to main content

Security report for jurlingva.lv

IK "Jurlingva" · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IK "Jurlingva" is a Latvian language center specializing in certified translations, notarial certifications, apostille legalization, and language courses primarily serving clients in Riga and Jurmala. The company positions itself as a professional and reliable service provider with a focus on timely delivery, confidentiality, and quality assurance, supported by ISO 17100:2015 certification. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support and clear contact information, enhancing accessibility for a diverse audience. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including service workers and integrates popular analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, though improvements in security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are recommended. Privacy compliance is addressed with visible cookie and privacy policies, indicating GDPR awareness. Overall, the website projects a trustworthy and professional image suitable for its business domain.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jurlingva.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jurlingva.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for jurlingva.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the translation and notarial services sector, targeting individuals and organizations requiring official document translations and certifications. Its market position is local and specialized, emphasizing quality and compliance with international standards. Revenue streams likely include translation services, notarization fees, apostille processing, and language course tuition. The company maintains direct contact channels and offers additional conveniences such as document courier services. The website's content and structure suggest a focus on customer trust and service transparency, with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries disclosed. Growth potential may be enhanced by expanding digital marketing and formalizing security and compliance disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of service workers indicates modern web practices, but the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. Tracking scripts from third parties introduce potential privacy risks, though cookie consent mechanisms are in place. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business size but would benefit from enhanced header policies, formal vulnerability disclosure, and regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Conduct regular third-party script audits to ensure no vulnerable or malicious code is included.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights in the privacy policy.
  5. Improve accessibility features and mobile responsiveness to broaden user reach and comply with standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
IK "Jurlingva"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IK "Jurlingva"
Description
Valodu centrs Rīgā un Jūrmalā. Tulkojums, notariālais apliecinājums un legalizācija ar apostille 1 2 darba dienu laikā. Juridisku, medicīnisku un mārketinga tekstu tulkošana un rediģēšana.
Key services
Certified translations, Notarial certification, Apostille legalization, Language courses, Document delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cloudfront CDN, Skrollr.js, Service Worker, Multiscreensite platform
Platforms
Multiscreensite CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service worker registered
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple service descriptions.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; unable to verify domain age or registrant details.
  3. Site uses HTTPS and modern web technologies including service workers.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliance is indicated.
  5. Contact information is clearly displayed with phone, email, and physical addresses.
  6. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Site content is in Latvian with multilingual support for English and Russian.
  9. Tracking includes Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Multiscreensite platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as Skrollr for parallax effects and service workers for offline capabilities. It integrates analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. The site uses CDN services for content delivery, improving performance. The HTML structure is well-formed with appropriate meta tags for SEO and social sharing. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility could be improved. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts and rich media content. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts and lack of advanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jurlingva.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jurlingva.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.